Reporting

Differences between revisions 1 and 39 (spanning 38 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2008-04-07 18:40:02
Size: 5277
Editor: c-67-168-235-241
Comment:
Revision 39 as of 2012-04-13 23:04:29
Size: 6425
Editor: static-50-53-79-63
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
#title Reporting X Bugs
||<tablestyle="float:right; font-size: 0.9em; background:#F1F1ED;margin: 0 0 1em 1em;" style="padding:2.0em;">'''Contents'''[[BR]][[TableOfContents(2)]]||
#title Writing a Good X Bug
<<Include(X/MenuBar)>>

The official way to report defects against Ubuntu's Xorg is:

||||<bgcolor="#f1f1DD;"style="width:100%;border-radius: 15px 15px 15px 15px;font-size: 2em; text-align: center;">'''ubuntu-bug xorg'''||||

This lets you attach a lot of common debugging data. But it's not enough!!

Include a '''detailed description''' of the problem.
 * A '''good description'''
 * '''Step-by-step directions''' for how you reproduced it
 * When was your system '''last working''' properly?
 * '''photo''' of the screen

If your report doesn't have a good description, and there's no relevant errors in your log files, your bug will be closed as not actionable and you'll be referred here. Don't be upset - the always-busy X package maintainers get a LOT of bug reports and need to focus their limited time on well-described problems. Instead, read this page and try again, making your new bug report a well-described problem.

Keep in mind that the Launchpad bug tracker is a development tool, not for technical support - Ubuntu does have [[http://www.ubuntu.com/support|volunteer and paid technical support staff]] but none of them frequent the bug tracker. In particular, if you're using a released version of Ubuntu, you probably should start with the technical support channels.

== Be Specific, Especially in the Title ==

X symptoms are often generic things like "booted with black screen", or "crashed", or "sluggish performance". Two distinct bugs can have the same symptoms but different causes. The more specific you are, the less likely some other confused reporter will spam your bug report with irrelevant messages.

== Focus on One Issue ==

The rule is "One Defect, One Person Per Report". Don't almalgamate every issue you find after an update. Otherwise, the maintainer will just pick one at random and all your other issues will be ignored. Instead, do a separate report for each distinct issue.

It's cheap and easy for the maintainers to dupe your reports together if it can be proven they all have the same cause.

== Banish 'Random' from Your Vocabulary ==

Many times it's unclear what is causing the X problem. But words like "randomly", "unexpectedly", "intermittently", etc. just gives the impression you haven't given your problem much thought or study.

If you simply can't characterize it, consider holding off on filing a bug report until you have a better understanding and can describe it more specifically.

== Use !!Science!! ==

Treat writing your bug report like you would writing a chemistry lab report.

Write down the '''procedure''' for producing the issue. Specify '''expected''' results and '''actual''' results. '''Identify variables''' - what has changed recently about your system, what makes your system unique, what you're doing when the problem occurs. Take lots of '''measurements''' - how many times a day did it happen? Does it happen only when you're on the computer, or also (only?) when idle? Make a '''hypothesis''' and attempt to disprove it. Repeat the '''experiment''' and see if you get the same results.

== Keep Calm and Carry On ==

Bugs can be frustrating, and X bugs particularly so, especially when it feels like no one is paying attention to your bug reports.

But don't give in to the dark side. Losing your cool and ranting can be quite unproductive, and just makes you look bad for all posterity. Instead keep discussions civil, and follow the [[http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct|Ubuntu Code of Conduct]]. There are millions of Ubuntu users, and thousands of bug reports and just a handful of people to work on fixes -- it simply is not humanly possible to give a personal reply to every bug report.

== Be Prepared to Roll Up Your Sleeves ==

Bug reports are a way to engage with the developers. It's not a support request, it's a way to participate in the development process itself. It may be limited to just testing the fix and verifying it works, or it could be extensively technical. Be ready to do some work, and be clear if you have time or technical limits you want to have honored.

Often, the more involved the reporter is at following up with new info, chasing down leads, locating patches or work arounds to test, and trying out variants, the more likely the bug will catch someone's interest and lend a hand.

== Reporting Bugs from a Different Machine ==

Apport does a good job of collecting information on certain kinds of bugs. By default, it tries to launch your web browser to complete the bug filing. But sometimes you can't do this. You can make apport capture bug data manually like this:

{{{
   apport-bug --save /tmp/foo.apport
}}}

Then copy that {{{foo.apport}}} file to the machine you want to file the bug from (using scp, rsync, a usb drive, or whatever), and then file it like this:

{{{
  apport-bug ~/foo.apport
}}}
Line 5: Line 69:
= Bug Reporting = For the situation where apport automatically captured a crash dump from a crash or X lockup, but you can't file it from the sick machine, you will find the file in your {{{/var/crash}}} directory on the sick machine. Copy that over to another machine and file it from there, like above:
Line 7: Line 71:
The lifecycle of a bug report begins, unsurprisingly, with the
preliminary report. How a bug is initially reported can have a huge
effect on how it's handled and how quickly it gets fixed.
{{{
  apport-bug /path/to/file.crash
}}}
Line 12: Line 76:
== Choosing a Good Title == The crash files can be unpacked (like if you only want certain files):
Line 14: Line 78:
Your title should communicate two things: The symptom you're seeing,
and whatever is unique or unusual about your system. Otherwise, your
bug may not get proper attention.
{{{
  mkdir ~/tmp
  apport-unpack /path/to/file.crash ~/tmp/
}}}
Line 18: Line 83:
''' Examples: '''
|| '''BAD''':|| Crazy screen issues on boot ||
|| '''BAD''':|| Multiple problems with CD today ||
|| '''BAD''':|| Not able to login or start X after updating ||
|| '''BAD''':|| Randomly doesn't work ||
|| '''GOOD''':|| [Feisty] Screen briefly corrupts during boot with -nv (NVidia 6100) ||
|| '''GOOD''':|| [Hardy Alpha-3] Alt-CD (only) selected wrong driver (Matrox / BenQ FP91+) ||
|| '''GOOD''':|| [Gutsy] Periodic crashes w/ high CPU on Dell Latitude D505 (-intel 855GM) ||
|| '''GOOD''':|| [Dapper,Edgy] Wrong default refresh rates on 16:10 LCD panels ||
|| '''GOOD''':|| After update to -intel 2.0-0ubuntu3, X fails with 'Invalid mode' error ||
== What Next? ==
Line 29: Line 85:
== Do's and Don't's == Once your X bug is reported, a triager may mark it Incomplete with questions or request some info, or mark as a dupe of a known issue, file it upstream, or determine it's not actually an X bug and move it somewhere else. Due to the volume of reports, automated scripts are used to help with triage; please be patient, these bots are not very smart.
Line 31: Line 87:
||<tablestyle="width: 80%;" style="background-color: #FF8080;"> DON'T: || Assume "they must already know about this" ||
||<style="background-color: lightgreen;"> DO: || Look for existing bug reports that match your problem ||
||||||
||<style="background-color: #FF8080;"> DON'T: || Assume a "similar" bug is exactly what you're seeing ||
||<style="background-color: lightgreen;"> DO: || File a new bug, but mention the ID's of all bugs that sound similar. Someone can dupe them together later. ||
||||||
||<style="background-color: #FF8080;"> DON'T: || Add "me too" responses. Wastes everyone's time. ||
||<style="background-color: lightgreen;"> DO: || Add missing data (photos, logs) to add to an existing bug's "knowledge base". Or if you just wish to be notified, then Subscribe yourself to the bug. ||
||||||
||<style="background-color: #FF8080;"> DON'T: || Post bugs with only a brief description of the problem ||
||<style="background-color: lightgreen;"> DO: || Post relevant logs, config files, and data (see table below) '''ALWAYS ATTACH YOUR /var/log/Xorg.0.log''' ||
||||||
||<style="background-color: #FF8080;"> DON'T: || Assume "everyone" is seeing this same bug ||
||<style="background-color: lightgreen;"> DO: || Consider what is unique about your system ||
||||||
||<style="background-color: #FF8080;"> DON'T: || Assume others will "just know" how the bug occurs ||
||<style="background-color: lightgreen;"> DO: || Itemize the exact steps that result in the issue. Can you reproduce it at will? ||
||||||
||<style="background-color: #FF8080;"> DON'T: || Fire and forget. Abandoned bugs rarely get fixed. ||
||<style="background-color: lightgreen;"> DO: || Follow up on your bug from time to time, even if it seems ignored. Report if the issue goes away or remains when new Ubuntu's come out. ||
If there is no reply from you within a month or two, the bug report may be closed as expired. You should feel free to reopen it once you have the needed information.
Line 52: Line 89:
If your bug is forwarded upstream, you should participate in the discussions there. You may need to register an account on bugs.freedesktop.org to do so. If upstream finds a fix, it will be evaluated for possible inclusion in Ubuntu, if the fix is straightforward and seems safe.
Line 53: Line 91:
== What to Include in Bug Reports ==

|| '''Problem class:''' || '''Things to Include:''' ||
||<|5(^> '''General X bug''' || Description of problem ||
|| Paste in output of {{{lspci -nn | grep VGA}}} ||
|| Attach /etc/X11/xorg.conf ||
|| Attach /var/log/Xorg.0.log ||
|| Attach output of `lspci -vvnn` ||
||<|7(^> '''Wrong resolutions, refresh rates, or monitor specs''' || Resolution, rate, or other parameter expected ||
|| Resolutions, rates, or other parameters actually obtained ||
|| /etc/X11/xorg.conf ||
|| /var/log/Xorg.0.log ||
|| output of `lspci -vvnn` ||
|| output of `sudo ddcprobe` ||
|| output of `xrandr` ||
||<|5(^> '''Wrong font dpi or size''' || Are you running GNOME, KDE, XFCE, or ...? ||
|| Affected (and unaffected) applications ||
|| /var/log/Xorg.0.log ||
|| output of `sudo ddcprobe` ||
|| Screenshot showing font differences ||
||<|11(^> '''X crash, lockup, freeze, exit, or doesn't start/shutdown''' || Detailed description of problem ||
|| List any versions you tried that did not have this issue ||
|| Detailed list of steps to reproduce ||
|| How complete is the X failure? [[BR]] + Does ctrl+alt+f1 take you to a console? [[BR]] + Does ctrl+alt+backspace restart X? [[BR]] + Does mouse pointer still move? [[BR]] + Does the keyboard LED come on when hitting the CAPSLOCK key? ||
|| /etc/X11/xorg.conf ||
|| /var/log/Xorg.0.log ||
|| /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old ||
|| ~/.xsession-errors ||
|| output of `lspci -vvnn` ||
|| output of `cat /proc/acpi/video/*/DOS` ||
|| output of `sudo cat /proc/acpi/dsdt` ||
||<|4(^> '''Keyboard, touchpad, and mouse issues''' || Description of the problem ||
|| /var/log/Xorg.0.log ||
|| output of `xprop -root` ||
|| output of `gconftool-2 -R /desktop/gnome/peripherals` ||
||<|4(^> '''Screen display corruption''' || Photo of the screen ||
|| Description of the problem ||
|| Does it also occur if DRI is disabled? ||
|| /var/log/Xorg.0.log ||
||<|3(^> '''Bad video playback''' || /etc/X11/xorg.conf ||
|| /var/log/Xorg.0.log ||
|| output of `lspci -vvnn` ||
If a fix is found and backported, you'll be asked to test and verify that it solves the issue. Often the fix can't be rolled out until someone validates it.

The official way to report defects against Ubuntu's Xorg is:

ubuntu-bug xorg

This lets you attach a lot of common debugging data. But it's not enough!!

Include a detailed description of the problem.

  • A good description

  • Step-by-step directions for how you reproduced it

  • When was your system last working properly?

  • photo of the screen

If your report doesn't have a good description, and there's no relevant errors in your log files, your bug will be closed as not actionable and you'll be referred here. Don't be upset - the always-busy X package maintainers get a LOT of bug reports and need to focus their limited time on well-described problems. Instead, read this page and try again, making your new bug report a well-described problem.

Keep in mind that the Launchpad bug tracker is a development tool, not for technical support - Ubuntu does have volunteer and paid technical support staff but none of them frequent the bug tracker. In particular, if you're using a released version of Ubuntu, you probably should start with the technical support channels.

Be Specific, Especially in the Title

X symptoms are often generic things like "booted with black screen", or "crashed", or "sluggish performance". Two distinct bugs can have the same symptoms but different causes. The more specific you are, the less likely some other confused reporter will spam your bug report with irrelevant messages.

Focus on One Issue

The rule is "One Defect, One Person Per Report". Don't almalgamate every issue you find after an update. Otherwise, the maintainer will just pick one at random and all your other issues will be ignored. Instead, do a separate report for each distinct issue.

It's cheap and easy for the maintainers to dupe your reports together if it can be proven they all have the same cause.

Banish 'Random' from Your Vocabulary

Many times it's unclear what is causing the X problem. But words like "randomly", "unexpectedly", "intermittently", etc. just gives the impression you haven't given your problem much thought or study.

If you simply can't characterize it, consider holding off on filing a bug report until you have a better understanding and can describe it more specifically.

Use !!Science!!

Treat writing your bug report like you would writing a chemistry lab report.

Write down the procedure for producing the issue. Specify expected results and actual results. Identify variables - what has changed recently about your system, what makes your system unique, what you're doing when the problem occurs. Take lots of measurements - how many times a day did it happen? Does it happen only when you're on the computer, or also (only?) when idle? Make a hypothesis and attempt to disprove it. Repeat the experiment and see if you get the same results.

Keep Calm and Carry On

Bugs can be frustrating, and X bugs particularly so, especially when it feels like no one is paying attention to your bug reports.

But don't give in to the dark side. Losing your cool and ranting can be quite unproductive, and just makes you look bad for all posterity. Instead keep discussions civil, and follow the Ubuntu Code of Conduct. There are millions of Ubuntu users, and thousands of bug reports and just a handful of people to work on fixes -- it simply is not humanly possible to give a personal reply to every bug report.

Be Prepared to Roll Up Your Sleeves

Bug reports are a way to engage with the developers. It's not a support request, it's a way to participate in the development process itself. It may be limited to just testing the fix and verifying it works, or it could be extensively technical. Be ready to do some work, and be clear if you have time or technical limits you want to have honored.

Often, the more involved the reporter is at following up with new info, chasing down leads, locating patches or work arounds to test, and trying out variants, the more likely the bug will catch someone's interest and lend a hand.

Reporting Bugs from a Different Machine

Apport does a good job of collecting information on certain kinds of bugs. By default, it tries to launch your web browser to complete the bug filing. But sometimes you can't do this. You can make apport capture bug data manually like this:

   apport-bug --save /tmp/foo.apport

Then copy that foo.apport file to the machine you want to file the bug from (using scp, rsync, a usb drive, or whatever), and then file it like this:

  apport-bug ~/foo.apport

For the situation where apport automatically captured a crash dump from a crash or X lockup, but you can't file it from the sick machine, you will find the file in your /var/crash directory on the sick machine. Copy that over to another machine and file it from there, like above:

  apport-bug /path/to/file.crash

The crash files can be unpacked (like if you only want certain files):

  mkdir ~/tmp
  apport-unpack /path/to/file.crash ~/tmp/

What Next?

Once your X bug is reported, a triager may mark it Incomplete with questions or request some info, or mark as a dupe of a known issue, file it upstream, or determine it's not actually an X bug and move it somewhere else. Due to the volume of reports, automated scripts are used to help with triage; please be patient, these bots are not very smart.

If there is no reply from you within a month or two, the bug report may be closed as expired. You should feel free to reopen it once you have the needed information.

If your bug is forwarded upstream, you should participate in the discussions there. You may need to register an account on bugs.freedesktop.org to do so. If upstream finds a fix, it will be evaluated for possible inclusion in Ubuntu, if the fix is straightforward and seems safe.

If a fix is found and backported, you'll be asked to test and verify that it solves the issue. Often the fix can't be rolled out until someone validates it.

X/Reporting (last edited 2016-01-10 21:36:02 by penalvch)