## page was renamed from BeginnersTeam/Meetings/20111123
#title #ubuntu-tv Meeting
Meeting started by MrChrisDruif at 17:03:18 UTC. The full logs are available [[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-tv/2011/ubuntu-tv.2011-11-23-17.03.log.html | here]]
.
== Meeting summary ==
''LINK:'' http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/UbuntuTV (MrChrisDruif, 17:05:11)<
>
''LINK:'' http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/11/22/%23ubuntu-tv.html (MrChrisDruif, 17:05:44)
*Prioritizing the list
Meeting ended at 18:08:46 UTC.
== Votes ==
== Action items ==
* (none)
== People present (lines said) ==
* Mr``Chris``Druif (91)
* dmj726 (28)
* Alan``Bell (28)
* popey (23)
* callumsaunders1 (18)
* IAmNotThatGuy (14)
* Wellark (13)
* tgm4883 (6)
* imnichol (6)
* meetingology (3)
== Full Log ==
{{{
17:03:18 #startmeeting
17:03:18 Meeting started Wed Nov 23 17:03:18 2011 UTC. The chair is MrChrisDruif. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlanBell/mootbot.
17:03:18
17:03:18 Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired
17:03:42 Welcome everyone, now we get "official"
17:03:54 Raise your hands for attendance
17:03:57 o/
17:04:01 Indeed
17:04:01 o/
17:04:03 o/
17:04:05 o/
17:04:27 o/
17:04:40 tgm4883 is unfortunately missing because of two interview back-to-back
17:04:53 oh, is the meeting actually now?
17:04:58 Yup
17:05:00 you're not just testing the bot?
17:05:01 popey, lol yep
17:05:02 oh, sorry
17:05:03 ☺
17:05:11 #link http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/UbuntuTV
17:05:26 (Quiet link acceptance?)
17:05:34 And another one
17:05:44 #link http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/11/22/%23ubuntu-tv.html
17:06:22 The first link is to the document we are about the further discuss. To know what has been discussed already, please look in the second link
17:06:23 Okay. Carryon
17:06:56 #topic Prioritizing the list
17:07:26 MrChrisDruif: yeah, #link doesn't do a massive amount right now, there is a bug about that
17:07:37 <_<"
17:07:49 It's still useful to mention the links =)
17:08:00 yes
17:08:51 We were going down the list from top to bottom and we got to Collaboration with Ubuntu devices
17:09:47 Does everybody understand the different sections? (They are pretty explanatory if you ask me)
17:09:52 hi! sorry for being late!
17:10:08 Welcome Wellark
17:10:13 Personally I think collaboration is high importance
17:10:31 It could be a pretty key differentiator for Ubuntu devices
17:10:44 +1
17:11:21 I'm not sure to put it in the high section.
17:11:47 Mark seems fairly keen on the idea too
17:11:54 yes, +1
17:11:59 i agree with with dmj726
17:12:10 high
17:12:15 as I've understood the "Unity Experience" is also largely about collaboration
17:12:19 MrChrisDruif, Any reasons for that thought?
17:13:14 Well, I think it might be a very good feature to have, I do think we shouldn't put it in the high because I don't know how many devs we will have and we can't have it all in high
17:13:55 Well, I think it's important to design with it in mind than to tack it on after all other things are implemented
17:14:14 well, I think the rest can be other than "high" :)
17:14:40 but collaboration between devices as high
17:14:41 Wellark; How do you mean? The things that are now in high you mean?
17:14:54 I mean the uncategorized ones
17:15:00 Okay, noted
17:15:09 there are only two left after this one
17:15:43 the high priority list seems to be pretty good package
17:15:56 So collaboration in High?
17:16:07 high
17:16:31 +1
17:16:55 Btw I had a note added after the meeting about the previous item
17:17:06 But you should consider what MrChrisDruif is talking about. Starting it with less number of developers will also lead to some wrong tracks and delay in work
17:18:17 We should try to figure out how many developers the project really has.
17:18:19 That is certainly something to keep in mind, but it's prospected to not have anything very functional until 13.04 or something
17:18:50 It's probably more important to get it right than get it done quick and have to backtrack
17:19:23 +1
17:19:25 Indeed
17:19:50 I don't feel the HIGH section is too cumbersome
17:19:51 dmj726, True. But if you ask me, then I will say "What about finding the right developers be the high priority job? =]"
17:20:12 is there a hardware reference specification?
17:20:14 anyway the items in high section have to be prioritized
17:20:26 So we should decide what the core functionality needs to be for a compelling offering, and then work toward that.
17:20:43 is it ARM or Atom for example?
17:20:46 all of it. except home automation
17:20:56 dmj726; that was the main reasoning in the different sections
17:20:56 what screen resolution? full HD?
17:21:00 that list should be ubuntu tv 1.0
17:21:31 0.00001
17:21:38 Haha, popey
17:21:51 popey +1000 ;D
17:22:02 also some things are easier to bolt on after the fact and others are much harder to change once you've gone far
17:22:13 What is absolutely required, is essential
17:22:33 That's why the plugin system is in high
17:22:53 It's not necessary, but it's a very useful way to add functionality later on
17:23:02 So essential is "what do we need for a working TV"
17:23:06 Yup
17:23:19 High is the "cool" system
17:23:31 We can even plan how it should be and can keep it for the next version (If needed)
17:23:31 Medium is the "awesome" system
17:23:32 high is "what do we need for a device that people will want beyond an ordinary tv"
17:23:33 yeah
17:23:57 And low is the "ICan'tDescribeThisInWords" system
17:24:50 for reference I suspect that control from portable devices will be very easy once we have Collaborate with other Ubuntu devices, just a little work on top of that framework
17:25:26 Yeah, that's why we initially put it in medium
17:25:39 and Push media to/from other Ubuntu devices / Media syncing capabilities would also fit within the framework
17:26:08 so implement collaboration framework and the other two are specific applications thereof
17:26:48 I tend to agree on that (I'm not a dev)
17:27:19 yeah, that sounds good
17:27:43 so we need the collaboration framework because that lets other devs make the TV very cool
17:28:17 this needs to be in tablet & phone & pc aswell
17:28:30 yes, it should be everywhere
17:28:40 So either all those should be in high OR in medium, and if we'd have to call it now I'd say high (seeing the functionality of collaboration with tablet/phones)
17:29:01 okay
17:29:10 Everyone agrees on that?
17:29:14 sure
17:29:18 sure
17:29:51 Alright, I'll move it up (and rephrase it after the meeting)
17:30:18 okies
17:30:48 I've put a note in the last one from the high (now at least) about collaboration with Ubuntu Phone & Tablet
17:31:21 I think we should also let them in on the "action" and pitch in where it's logical
17:31:42 yeah
17:31:50 (Luckily I've noticed that a lot from #ubuntu-phone & #ubuntu-tablet are already here)
17:32:13 But we still should give a shout-out to them on their mailing-lists
17:32:19 Also, input from other devices greatly enhances our 10' UX capabilities
17:32:44 (think typing on tablet vs typical TV keyboards for search)
17:33:01 its just gravy
17:33:03 True that (or even a laptop =) )
17:33:20 Anyhow, shall we continue down the line?
17:33:33 maybe gravy, but definitely a pain point on traditional ui
17:33:34 yep
17:33:36 k
17:33:38 moving on
17:34:04 Alright, next one is: Sharing media with friends
17:34:17 it's a good way to get word out
17:34:48 With social media, think of youtube like/dislike, facebook, twitter, diaspora, what-have-you?
17:34:48 I think this sounds like a great plugin if done right
17:35:30 i would say low
17:35:32 Indeed, but now it's about prioritizing =)
17:36:03 low +1
17:36:17 I would say medium as low is really "awful" things like home automation, which might even be more for server than tv
17:36:38 yeah, higher than home automation, but not high
17:36:44 But home automation should have a friendly shell for which a TV might be a good medium
17:36:56 So medium is good I think
17:37:03 Home automation would be a good app for a tv
17:37:12 +1 on that callumsaunders1
17:37:46 Alright, next is Purchasing media
17:38:10 this would mostly be web interfaces for stores?
17:39:34 Yes, I would think so. Use case: search for a movie > if it is available for purchase it gets highlighted in the search results
17:39:57 I think of VOD (in high quality of course)
17:40:00 youtube do movies now, is that part of their api?
17:40:23 * MrChrisDruif doesn't know, nor care at this moment
17:40:32 lol ok
17:40:38 Is it in the right location in medium?
17:40:41 i would say medium
17:41:03 +1 on that
17:42:12 First a good basis/rich system, then we can think about financial stuff like buying content
17:42:30 So medium it is?
17:43:10 Silence says it all I think, moving on =)
17:43:33 Next has already been done I think: Home automation
17:43:51 Anyone disagreeing with the Low priority?
17:43:59 not even sure it should be there at all
17:44:54 That's the advantage of low priority, we can always decide to drop it all together in a later stage, but for now I'd say keep it in =)
17:45:51 If Ubuntu want a complete system, then home automation should get a place in there. For the front-end I think it's a good idea to have it on TV
17:46:07 Any other comments?
17:46:31 im happy
17:46:38 Good to hear =)
17:46:44 Alright, moving on
17:47:06 There has been an addition since yesterday: TV Guide
17:47:50 I think this one falls under Watching Media in Essential
17:48:59 Otherwise it could be easily implemented with the plugin system; devs what do you think?
17:50:11 dmj726? popey? IAmNotThatGuy? Others?
17:50:17 * AlanBell thinks mythbuntu does all of this already
17:50:25 it needs a unity theme
17:50:37 with lancher and lens type gui
17:50:55 then everything is either already done, or a mythtv plugin
17:51:08 already has the 10' /3m user interface
17:51:27 If we need some changes, then we can work on that plugin
17:51:30 TV guide is there, weather, home automation stuff like that
17:52:01 AlanBell; I think it was tgm4883 that already commented that we should try to use current software solutions
17:52:32 so a chunky launcher bar on the left selecting live tv, recorded stuff, playback of DVDs (which would already pop up in the launcher)
17:52:43 lens for current live channels
17:52:49 So if Mythbuntu already fits the bill, that would save a lot of effort
17:53:06 however, what are we targetting?
17:53:24 Hardware-wise you mean?
17:53:28 what is the hardware platform? does the OEM team have a customer hardware specification in mind?
17:53:58 hardware, broadband connectivity, screen resolution, screen size etc
17:54:15 is this for a settop box or something integrated in TVs?
17:54:16 Do we even have a OEM team? =/
17:55:01 yes, canonical has an OEM team
17:55:17 Alright, then we haven't spoken to them about that
17:56:06 Back for 2 minutes before the next interview
17:56:25 were there concept drawings done for unity on tv when unity was being designed?
17:56:28 tgm4883; I wanted to close up, but if you have anything to say, do so =)
17:57:43 looks good, the TV guide data is necessary for any DVR type functionality
17:58:10 AlanBell, Mythbuntu does fit the bill for a lot of this, but I think we need to change the frontend
17:58:10 AlanBell; any suggestions for what we should do next? Speak to which teams, to get an idea of what kind of concept canonical already has envisioned for Ubuntu TV?
17:58:24 I don't think the MythTV frontend is capable/flashy enough for what we want
17:58:28 I suggested XBMC
17:58:54 fine, whichever
17:59:03 and time for interview #2
17:59:47 we could contribute improvements upstream for one or the other
17:59:57 Indeed
18:00:08 Hey everyone, that meeting still happening?
18:00:27 is it for ARM or x86?
18:01:33 Does anybody feel for inquiring for this information?
18:01:46 * popey returns
18:02:06 And besides ARM or x86; settop-box or integrated
18:02:15 both and both
18:02:17 :D
18:02:21 there, that was easy
18:02:23 Probably
18:02:40 I dont think we're far enough down the line to make decisions about hardware platforms
18:02:45 full HD?
18:02:49 yes
18:03:02 where full = 1080p
18:03:07 yup
18:03:36 that makes a huge difference in gui design
18:03:50 yeah, needs a massive interface
18:04:00 big fonts, big icons/pictures
18:04:08 cover art etc
18:04:10 and crisp, svg all the way
18:04:20 That's the idea of 10' interface, right?
18:05:45 17:58:10 < MrChrisDruif> AlanBell; any suggestions for what we should do next? Speak to which teams, to get an idea of what kind of concept canonical already has envisioned for Ubuntu TV?
18:05:53 Anyhow, I'm wasted. Shall we call it a day?
18:05:55 Design Team and Product Strategy
18:06:05 Thanks popey =)
18:06:06 (are who you might want to speak to)
18:06:07 Are we going to return to the idea of home automation at all?
18:06:11 Or did I miss that?
18:06:13 willcooke and myself both work in product strategy
18:06:25 imnichol; we will keep it low for now =)
18:06:26 and the design team live in #ubuntu-design
18:06:47 Ok cool. I've got some concerns about the right place for it, but I'll register them later
18:06:53 I think for a first run the main focus should be "choosing video to play" and "playing video" ☺
18:07:04 imnichol; read the logs afterwards
18:07:11 where that content comes from who knows, how we play it, who knows..
18:07:32 MrChrisDruif: reading them now.
18:07:57 popey; AlanBell; others; shall I #endmeeting ?
18:08:10 fine by me
18:08:21 yea
18:08:25 yup
18:08:26 Alright
18:08:43 Thanks everyone for showing up and raising your voice =)
18:08:46 #endmeeting
}}}
Generated by Meet``Bot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlanBell/mootbot)