2010Feb10

Differences between revisions 4 and 5
⇤ ← Revision 4 as of 2010-02-10 20:13:57 →
Size: 433
Editor: 17
Comment:
← Revision 5 as of 2010-02-11 03:33:06 → ⇥
Size: 1971
Editor: conr-adsl-209-169-122-85
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
=== Agenda === === Agenda and Minutes ===
Line 5: Line 5:
 1. Call to order in #ubuntustudio-devel at [[http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=2&day=10&year=2010&hour=19&min=0&sec=0&p1=0|7pm (19:00) UTC Feb 10 2010]]
 2. Agenda amendments
 3. Jack into Main
 4. RT or low-latency kernel plan
 5. status check against Debian for syncs/merges
 5. REVU process - which packages need attention?
 6. Website plan
 7. Plymouth		   1. Call to order in #ubuntustudio-devel at [[http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=2&day=10&year=2010&hour=19&min=0&sec=0&p1=0|7pm (19:00) UTC Feb 10 2010]]
   * stochastic, persia, abogani, scottl attended along with a few non-dev types to observe
  1. Agenda amendments
   * Persia suggested adding status check against Debian for syncs/merges
  1. Jack into Main
   * scottl noted that MIR has been filed - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionReportJACK
   * persia reported that a MIR backlog existed
   * stochastic agreed to preemptively prepare patches for packages that depend on libjack-dev to prepare getting packages in before the FF
   * persia committed to follow up with a few MIR people to facilitate a review of the JACK MIR
   * persia suggested designating an Active Release Delegate
   * at which point stochastic toyed with the idea of volunteering as the delegate
   * lastly under this point perisa noted that we had 8 days to get MIR approval and upload patches for packages with JACK support before the FF
  1. RT or low-latency kernel plan
   * abogani remarked that UKT apparently does not appear to be interested in a -lowlatency kernel and are releasing a -preempt instead
   * abogani worried about communication deterioration and persia offered to continue discussions with technical assistance from abogani
   * at this point abogani and persia appeared to speak in tongues using words as SLUB/SLAB, CONFIG_TREE_PREEEMPT_RCU=y, FTRACE and TICKLESS
   * persia commented that he would reply to rtg about TICKLESS results (https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2010-January/008570.html)
   * abogani replied that rtg had already seen the results
   * stochastic decided that abogani would place his
  1. status check against Debian for syncs/merges
  1. REVU process - which packages need attention?
  1. Website plan
  1. Plymouth

Agenda and Minutes

Please edit at will.

  1. Call to order in #ubuntustudio-devel at 7pm (19:00) UTC Feb 10 2010

    • stochastic, persia, abogani, scottl attended along with a few non-dev types to observe
  2. Agenda amendments
    • Persia suggested adding status check against Debian for syncs/merges
  3. Jack into Main

    • scottl noted that MIR has been filed - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionReportJACK

    • persia reported that a MIR backlog existed
    • stochastic agreed to preemptively prepare patches for packages that depend on libjack-dev to prepare getting packages in before the FF
    • persia committed to follow up with a few MIR people to facilitate a review of the JACK MIR
    • persia suggested designating an Active Release Delegate
    • at which point stochastic toyed with the idea of volunteering as the delegate
    • lastly under this point perisa noted that we had 8 days to get MIR approval and upload patches for packages with JACK support before the FF
  4. RT or low-latency kernel plan
    • abogani remarked that UKT apparently does not appear to be interested in a -lowlatency kernel and are releasing a -preempt instead
    • abogani worried about communication deterioration and persia offered to continue discussions with technical assistance from abogani
    • at this point abogani and persia appeared to speak in tongues using words as SLUB/SLAB, CONFIG_TREE_PREEEMPT_RCU=y, FTRACE and TICKLESS

    • persia commented that he would reply to rtg about TICKLESS results (https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2010-January/008570.html)

    • abogani replied that rtg had already seen the results
    • stochastic decided that abogani would place his
  5. status check against Debian for syncs/merges
  6. REVU process - which packages need attention?
  7. Website plan
  8. Plymouth

UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2010Feb10 (last edited 2010-02-11 12:27:17 by conr-adsl-209-169-122-85)