Meeting opened by pedro_ at 19:00

• <kamusin>

  <pedro_> Hello everybody and welcome to our weekly meeting!

  <sense> Ah, winter time!

  <sense> hello everybody

  <pedro_> As usual agenda for today can be found here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Meetings

  <pedro_> [TOPIC] Agenda

Agenda

• <pedro_> # review previous action items (all)

  <pedro_> # Bugday -- pedro_

  <pedro_> # UDS Feedback -- all

  <pedro_> # Selection of new chair -- pedro_

  <pedro_> i don't see the SRU report there, is that ok jibel ?

  <jibel> no that's not ok

  <pedro_> ok let's fix that then

  <jibel> there IS an sru report today, as usual

  <pedro_> thanks jibel

  <pedro_> ok let's go for the first item and then jibel can give us the SRU report

  <pedro_> [TOPIC] review previous action items

review previous action items

• <pedro_> according to the log : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Meetings/20101103

  <pedro_> there's only 1 action item for this meeting

  <pedro_> which is: pedro_ to reset Google calendar for QA meetings

  <pedro_> and that's already done

• charlie-tca raises hand

  <pedro_> but looks like Google calendar went crazy

  <pedro_> and it's showing all the meetings 1 hour later

• charlie-tca lowers hand again

  <pedro_> is that due to the DST ?

  <pedro_> charlie-tca, go ahead please

  <charlie-tca> you said it already

  <pedro_> ah ok, so i guess we need to adjust the calendar again?

  <charlie-tca> or wait to see if it fixes itself soon

  <pedro_> ok let's wait till the end of the week otherwise i'll contact the fridge folks again

  <pedro_> [TOPIC] SRU Testing

SRU Testing

• <pedro_> jibel, the stage is all yours

  <jibel> Hello all

  <jibel> Over the past weeks 68 packages have been published to stable releases

  <jibel> The list is available at

  <jibel> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/SRUReports/2010-11-10

• <jibel> * A total of 37 packages have been published to maverick

  <jibel> * 9 packages published to maverick-updates: chromium-browser, gdb, hplip, kde4libs, linux-linaro, linux-meta-linaro, linux-ti-omap4, system-config-printer, sysvinit

  <jibel> * 4 packages published to maverick-security: cups, flashplugin-nonfree, freetype, pidgin

  <jibel> * 24 packages published to maverick-proposed: apparmor, apport, armel-cross-toolchain-base, bzr-builddeb, cairo, chromium-browser, eclipse-cdt, eglibc, evolution, gnome-keyring, humanity-icon-theme, light-themes, linux, linux-ti-omap4, nautilus, nautilus-share, openldap, pianobar, plymouth, rhythmbox, software-center, vino, x-loader, xserver-xorg-video-intel

  <jibel> * A total of 16 packages have been published to lucid

  <jibel> * 4 packages published to lucid-updates: chromium-browser, docky, redhat-cluster, udev

  <jibel> * 5 packages published to lucid-security: cups, flashplugin-nonfree, freetype, libvirt, pidgin

  <jibel> * 7 packages published to lucid-proposed: chromium-browser, debian-installer, dnspython, evolution, glusterfs, linux-meta, plymouth

  <jibel> * A total of 9 packages have been published to karmic

  <jibel> * 3 packages published to karmic-updates: linux, linux-mvl-dove, xserver-xorg-video-intel

  <jibel> * 4 packages published to karmic-security: cups, flashplugin-nonfree, freetype, pidgin

  <jibel> * 2 packages published to karmic-proposed: mesa, tomboy

  <jibel> * 4 packages published to hardy-security: cupsys, flashplugin-nonfree, freetype, pidgin

  <jibel> * 2 packages published to dapper-security: cupsys, freetype

  <jibel> Thanks to Evan Broder (ebroder), DLCBurggraaff, Claudio Veschetti, D Tangman, dicairo, eballetbo, Gary M (game2), Irihapeti, John Rigby, Daniel Kulesz, Louis-Dominique Dubeau, Torez Smith, Martijn, mypc, NTolerance, Riccardo Murri, Rohan Garg (evilshadeslayer), madbiologist, Sebastien JAN (sebjan), Scott Howard (showard), The Loeki and Wolfgang Kufner for testing packages in -proposed.

  <jibel> As always, you can see the current set of packages needing testing in the -proposed queue at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html . Your assistance in testing is always appreciated!

  <pedro_> indeed thanks a lot to all the contributors

  <jibel> any comment/question ?

  <pedro_> any questions for jibel?

  <pedro_> heh

  <jibel> ok then, one more thing.

  <jibel> Last week we talked about adding update testing as opportunities in Harvest.

  <jibel> Its done, congrats to bdmurray !

  <pedro_> awesome news!

• bdmurray waves

  <pedro_> thanks bdmurray!

  <jibel> To see it live, go to http://harvest.ubuntu.com/opportunities/, in the opportunities list on the left, you'll find update-testing-RELEASE

  <jibel> Checking these items will display the current SRUs (uncheck the limit on packages)

  <pedro_> nice nice

  <pedro_> anything else jibel ?

  <jibel> no, that's all for today

  <pedro_> jibel, ok, thank you!

  <pedro_> [TOPIC] Bugdays

Bugdays

• <pedro_> ok long time without having a bug day

  <pedro_> for tomorrow we organized one for the Bugs without a package: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20101111

  <pedro_> as you can see there, the vast majority of the bugs were already triaged!

  <pedro_> so we might need to add some more bugs to that list

  <bdmurray> heh, awesome

  <pedro_> thanks to our rocking contributors : komputes, kamus, mistrynitesh and yofel for their amazing work

  <charlie-tca> Great!

  <komputes> pedro_: and the bugday didn't even start yet

  <pedro_> let's add another 100 for tomorrow

  <komputes> pedro_: lets

  <komputes>

  <pedro_> komputes, that makes you even more amazing

  <komputes> hehe

  <jibel> pedro_, don't be shy. add the remaining 513 bugs without a package and see how low we can go.

  <pedro_> as always if you have an idea please add it to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/Planning

  <pedro_> jibel, heh only if you help us too

  <pedro_> ok lets roll

  <jibel> ok, I need some karma

• kamusin jibel, yes! we can do it

  <pedro_> [TOPIC] UDS Feedback

UDS Feedback

• <pedro_> i see that item also included on the previous meeting agenda

  <pedro_> is there anything else to discuss or that was added/leaved there for mistake?

  <pedro_> marjo, ^

  <charlie-tca> I think pedro_ wasn't here to discuss his stuff, maybe?

  <marjo> pedro_ left there by mistake

  <pedro_> charlie-tca, we discussed our items at the bugsquad meeting anyways

  <pedro_> ok next item on the agenda is

  <pedro_> [TOPIC] AOB

AOB

• <pedro_> anything else to raise, discuss, announce, etc?

  <marjo> pedro: yes

  <pedro_> please go ahead marjo

  <marjo> blueprints reminder: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu?searchtext=qa-n

• pedro_ pass the mic to marjo

  <marjo> please review and update the blueprints assigned to you, so we can finalize all blueprints by end of this week

  <marjo> thx

  <marjo> that's it from me, pedro_

  <pedro_> thank you marjo

  <pedro_> anything else guys?

  <jibel> o/

  <pedro_> go for it jibel

  <jibel> with DST this meeting time is not really convenient can we move it by 1 hour ?

  <jibel> in europe it 2000

  <jibel> or 8:00PM

  <pedro_> eek...

  <marjo> ditto

  <pedro_> same to ara then

  <pedro_> so 1 hour backwards, 1800 UTC ?

  <jibel> same to all the community members in europe

  <jibel> excepted UK.

  <pedro_> 1800 UTC sounds good to everybody ?

  <jibel> lets vote

  <marjo> jibel: we chose 1700 and 1900 a few months ago, so that we can accommodate as many time zones as possible (independent of DST)

  <jibel> +1

  <mainerror> +1

  <pedro_> wait wait wait

  <hggdh> +1

  <charlie-tca> wait

  <kamusin> +1

  <pedro_> [VOTE]

• hggdh waits

  <pedro_> now you can vote

  <hggdh> +1

  <mainerror> +1

  <jibel> +1

  <kamusin> +1

  <charlie-tca> Keep in mind, every other week we meet two hours earlier

  <pedro_> +1

  <marjo> folks: please see my note above!

  <marjo> jibel: we chose 1700 and 1900 a few months ago, so that we can accommodate as many time zones as possible (independent of DST)

  <hggdh> hum

  <marjo> remember?!

  <pedro_> but is not good now since the application of DST

  <hggdh> perhaps 1600 and 1800?

  <charlie-tca> That seems wrong. Wasn't 20:00 UTC the most popular hour?

  <jibel> marjo, yes, I remember.

  <marjo> charlie-tca: the compromise we reached was to flip every other week

  <marjo> that's how we ended up with these two times; do we want to reconsider based on jibel's request?

  <charlie-tca> but this is going the wrong way, and when time changes again, we move them again?

  <marjo> charlie-tca: yes, we would have to flip at every DT/non-DT change

  <marjo> that's the beauty of UTC!

  <hggdh> and the bane...

  <pedro_> so what would be?

  <charlie-tca> yeah. that puts me at 8 am for the earlier meeting.

  <hggdh> bdmurray: what about you?

  <bdmurray> charlie and I are in the same tz

  <marjo> can we defer vote until next week (to include ara in discussion)?

  <hggdh> yes.

  <pedro_> sure

  <hggdh> pedro_: voting is still open

  <marjo> pedro_ thx much

  <pedro_> [ENDVOTE]

• <pedro_> [ACTION] Discuss meeting times

• <pedro_> so we don't forget about it

  <pedro_> anything else?

  <charlie-tca> Might be good to see what else we are conflicting with moving these meetings

  <pedro_> 3

  <pedro_> yup, lets review it and share it next week

  <pedro_> ok if there is nothing else:

  <pedro_> [TOPIC] Selection of new chair

Selection of new chair

• <pedro_> any volunteer ?

• hggdh hides

  <marjo> pedro: i've updated the next meeting agenda for that topic and assigned it to jibel

  <pedro_> thank you marjo

  <hggdh> oh, jibel is the volunteer?

  <pedro_> didn't i heard jibel?

  <marjo> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Meetings

  <jibel> yes

  <hggdh> \o/

  <pedro_> [ACTION] jibel to chair next meeting

• <jibel> is that all, I was expecting a general ovation

  <pedro_> last call, anything else to raise, discuss, etc?

  <hggdh> I did

  <pedro_> 3

  <pedro_> 2

  <pedro_> 1

  <pedro_> #endmeeting

---

Meeting closed at 19:36

People Present

• kamusin
• pedro_
• sense
• jibel
• charlie-tca
• bdmurray
• komputes
• marjo
• mainerror
• hggdh

Actions Recorded

• Discuss meeting times
• jibel to chair next meeting