== Meeting ==
 * '''Who''': SecurityTeam
 * '''When''': [[http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=04&day=11&year=2011&hour=28&min=0&sec=0&p1=0|Mon April 11th 2011 17:00 UTC]]
 * '''End''': 17:30 UTC
 * '''Where''': #ubuntu-meeting on irc.freenode.net
 * '''Chaired By''': JamieStrandboge (jdstrand)

== Attendance ==
 * kees
 * mdeslaur
 * sbeattie
 * micahg
 * jjohansen
 * jdstrand

== Not present ==
 * None

== Agenda ==
 * Review of any previous action items
  * Comodo aftermath should be done (excepting chromium-browser?)
 * Weekly stand-up report (each member discusses any pending and planned future work for the week)
  * jdstrand
   * Weekly role: happy place
   * short week last week
   * kde updates
   * bisect two natty bugs, follow-up on various other bugs
    * jjohansen offered to help with builds (thanks!)
   * archive admin for Beta-2
   * performance reviews
   * usn microsite
  * kees
   * Weekly role: happy place
   * last week: Unity, patch pilot
   * catch-up on state of kernel hardening
   * beta-2 and QRT
   * pending updates
  * mdeslaur
   * Weekly role: community
   * pending updates
  * sbeattie
   * Weekly role: triage
   * last week: good progress on automated AppArmor builds via jenkins ppa
   * pending updates
  * micahg
   * Weekly role: happy place
   * chromium regression: password database can't be accessed after upgrade. Upstream hasn't moved on it at all. May fix in the future at which point will have 2 password databases that are out of sync. Poor user experience and support provided by upstream. Will issue update anyway.
    * [ACTION] micahg to coordinate practicality of NEWS file with fta and adjust changelog
   * pending updates
 * Miscellaneous and Questions
  * hardy desktop eol May 12th
  * performance reviews are entered into the system
  * UDS topics: for now just keep individual lists for what to bring forward/review/add
  * apparmor in Debian
   * enable in kernel and ship a reduced userspace? jjohansen says that should be fine
   * Debian won't enable AppArmor because it can't be compiled as a module. LSMs can't be compiled as modules, so non-starter. This is an odd stance since they have selinux compiled in, no tomoyo in the kernel but with tomoyo userspace, and neither AppArmor kernel or userspace
  * usn microsite

== Log ==
Logs available at http://www.novarata.net/mootbot/