MartinManey
|
Size: 562
Comment:
|
Size: 863
Comment: knock me over with a brickbat!
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| It's slow as a dog, has stupid designer markups, and a wimpy imitation of moin-moin markup. Oh, and real wikis don't hide search on a separate page - searching a wiki is too important for such stupidity. Still, it's somewhat like a wiki. That which does not drive us stark staring mad may yet be useful. | Well, well. Maybe it's just a fluke, but tonight the wiki seems to be running, rather than crawling. And someone has rooted out the stupid web artiste CSS that was presenting text in teeny, hard to read type. I know there's been a search feature up at the top for a while now, so that leaves only the pale imitation of moin-moin markup, which I haven't actually checked on lately. Oh. That's because it '''is''' Moin again. Well, Hurrah! (truly, I hadn't noticed that until after writing the above, and was wondering if whatever they did could be done to other Zope-infested sites. guess not.) |
| Line 6: | Line 15: |
MartinManey
Well, well. Maybe it's just a fluke, but tonight the wiki seems to be running, rather than crawling. And someone has rooted out the stupid web artiste CSS that was presenting text in teeny, hard to read type. I know there's been a search feature up at the top for a while now, so that leaves only the pale imitation of moin-moin markup, which I haven't actually checked on lately.
Oh. That's because it is Moin again. Well, Hurrah! (truly, I hadn't noticed that until after writing the above, and was wondering if whatever they did could be done to other Zope-infested sites. guess not.)
In high-resolution print typography, designers enjoy considerable freedom and control over the articulation of this (font size) range. In low-resolution screen typography, designers don't. - Todd Fahrner
MartinManey (last edited 2008-08-06 16:39:27 by localhost)