LiveCDPerformance
|
Size: 1299
Comment: correct fabio
|
Size: 1594
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 30: | Line 30: |
| Performance issues in two areas: 1) Installer Can generation of locales be made faster? Background things like network setup? X session 2) Post-di boot Readahead configuration may be suboptimal Do we need gdm? NEEDS INSTRUMENTATION - do we have detailed enough logfiles? |
Live CD Performance
Status
Created: Date(2005-04-23T03:04:58Z) by MattZimmermanBR
Priority: MediumPriorityBR
People: MatthewGarrettLead, FabioDiNittoSecondBR
Contributors: MattZimmermanBR
Interested: BR
Status: BrainDump, BreezyGoal, UduBof, DistroSpecificationBR
Branch: BR
Malone Bug: BR
Packages: BR
Depends: BR
UduSessions: 1, 4, 8, etc BR
Introduction
The boot time for the Ubuntu live CD should be comparable (or superior) to other popular live CDs.
Rationale
Scope and Use Cases
Implementation Plan
Performance issues in two areas:
1) Installer
Can generation of locales be made faster? Background things like network setup? X session
2) Post-di boot
Readahead configuration may be suboptimal Do we need gdm?
NEEDS INSTRUMENTATION - do we have detailed enough logfiles?
Data Preservation and Migration
Packages Affected
User Interface Requirements
Outstanding Issues
UDU BOF Agenda
- d-i performance
- casper performance
Ubuntu boot performance (FasterBoot)
UDU Pre-Work
- Profile the live CD boot sequence to measure the time taken for each step
- d-i startup (time-to-first-question)
- Pre-casper d-i activity (measured per menu entry)
- Casper d-i activity (measured per casper.d script)
- Standard boot sequence
LiveCDPerformance (last edited 2008-08-06 16:14:57 by localhost)