LiveCDPerformance

Differences between revisions 5 and 6
Revision 5 as of 2005-04-24 11:15:04
Size: 1299
Editor: intern146
Comment: correct fabio
Revision 6 as of 2005-04-25 05:22:57
Size: 1594
Editor: intern146
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 30: Line 30:
Performance issues in two areas:

1) Installer

Can generation of locales be made faster?
Background things like network setup?
X session


2) Post-di boot

Readahead configuration may be suboptimal
Do we need gdm?

NEEDS INSTRUMENTATION - do we have detailed enough logfiles?

Live CD Performance

Status

Introduction

The boot time for the Ubuntu live CD should be comparable (or superior) to other popular live CDs.

Rationale

Scope and Use Cases

Implementation Plan

Performance issues in two areas:

1) Installer

Can generation of locales be made faster? Background things like network setup? X session

2) Post-di boot

Readahead configuration may be suboptimal Do we need gdm?

NEEDS INSTRUMENTATION - do we have detailed enough logfiles?

Data Preservation and Migration

Packages Affected

User Interface Requirements

Outstanding Issues

UDU BOF Agenda

  • d-i performance
  • casper performance
  • Ubuntu boot performance (FasterBoot)

UDU Pre-Work

  • Profile the live CD boot sequence to measure the time taken for each step
    • d-i startup (time-to-first-question)
    • Pre-casper d-i activity (measured per menu entry)
    • Casper d-i activity (measured per casper.d script)
    • Standard boot sequence

LiveCDPerformance (last edited 2008-08-06 16:14:57 by localhost)