HardwareDatabaseClientOverhaul

Differences between revisions 2 and 3
⇤ ← Revision 2 as of 2007-05-14 10:00:57 →
Size: 1173
Editor: 87
Comment: add Sevilla BoF notes
← Revision 3 as of 2007-05-14 10:01:39 → ⇥
Size: 1592
Editor: 87
Comment: add use cases from Sevilla discussion
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 14: Line 14:

 * Information about a machine to help diagnosing a bug report
 * Locating users willing to assist with testing new upstream versions that may fix their issue
 * Providing hardware statistics when communicating to vendors (anonymous data)
 * Laptop testing and certification
 * Highlighting hardware/driver combination conflicts
 * Comparing before/after situations when swapping between two alternate drivers.

Please check the status of this specification in Launchpad before editing it. If it is Approved, contact the Assignee or another knowledgeable person before making changes.

  • Launchpad entry: none yet

  • Packages affected:

Summary

Rationale

Use cases

  • Information about a machine to help diagnosing a bug report
  • Locating users willing to assist with testing new upstream versions that may fix their issue
  • Providing hardware statistics when communicating to vendors (anonymous data)
  • Laptop testing and certification
  • Highlighting hardware/driver combination conflicts
  • Comparing before/after situations when swapping between two alternate drivers.

Scope

Design

Implementation

Code

Data preservation and migration

Unresolved issues

BoF agenda and discussion

  • Once the data is filtered and anonymized, apport should include the ID in bug reports
  • Remove the bling stuff from hwdb-client (gnome-canvas prevents i18n), i18n and HIGify it. Also remove the comment field since it looks like bug reports through the backdoor
  • Fedora's smolt project looks promising; we might be able to share code/db with those and should merge the wizard style
  • Allow HWDB client to be run a second time, such as if a user changes hardware or if the submit didn't work (if it's already implemented, make it an easy-to-find button)

CategorySpec

HardwareDatabaseClientOverhaul (last edited 2008-12-09 21:07:17 by jan4)