HardwareDatabaseClientOverhaul

Differences between revisions 1 and 2
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2006-11-07 06:53:20 →
Size: 671
Editor: 209-79-152-253
Comment:
← Revision 2 as of 2007-05-14 10:00:57 → ⇥
Size: 1173
Editor: 87
Comment: add Sevilla BoF notes
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 29: Line 29:
Please see the feedback from Usability El on KubuntuHWDBFeedback  * Once the data is filtered and anonymized, apport should include the ID in bug reports

 * Remove the bling stuff from hwdb-client (gnome-canvas prevents i18n), i18n and HIGify it. Also remove the comment field since it looks like bug reports through the backdoor

 * Fedora's smolt project looks promising; we might be able to share code/db with those and should merge the wizard style

 *Allow HWDB client to be run a second time, such as if a user changes hardware or if the submit didn't work (if it's already implemented, make it an easy-to-find button)

Please check the status of this specification in Launchpad before editing it. If it is Approved, contact the Assignee or another knowledgeable person before making changes.

  • Launchpad entry: none yet

  • Packages affected:

Summary

Rationale

Use cases

Scope

Design

Implementation

Code

Data preservation and migration

Unresolved issues

BoF agenda and discussion

  • Once the data is filtered and anonymized, apport should include the ID in bug reports
  • Remove the bling stuff from hwdb-client (gnome-canvas prevents i18n), i18n and HIGify it. Also remove the comment field since it looks like bug reports through the backdoor
  • Fedora's smolt project looks promising; we might be able to share code/db with those and should merge the wizard style
  • Allow HWDB client to be run a second time, such as if a user changes hardware or if the submit didn't work (if it's already implemented, make it an easy-to-find button)

CategorySpec

HardwareDatabaseClientOverhaul (last edited 2008-12-09 21:07:17 by jan4)