ForumCouncilAgenda
|
Size: 2180
Comment: Hai, tis me ^^
|
Size: 2181
Comment: typo.
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 11: | Line 11: |
| ||[https://launchpad.net/~bapoumba bapoumba]||aircrack-ng tutorials. Some have been removed (ie moved to jail with the OP's agreement), some are still on boards. Although a legitimate application, it can be misused. Should UF allow wireless crack support? Sould a clear policy be written to have all the tutorial handled the same way?|| | ||[https://launchpad.net/~bapoumba bapoumba]||aircrack-ng tutorials. Some have been removed (ie moved to jail with the OP's agreement), some are still on boards. Although a legitimate application, it can be misused. Should UF allow wireless crack support? Should a clear policy be written to have all the tutorial handled the same way?|| |
You can use this page to nominate items for discussion by the ForumCouncil. See the [http://www.ubuntuforums.org/forumdisplay.php?f=198 Forum Council] page for more information about the Council.
Forum Council meetings will be held on #ubuntu-meeting on irc.freenode.net (this is subject to change) Next meeting November 8th, 20:00UTC
General Agenda Items and Proposals
If you put an item on the agenda, you will have to show up. Otherwise the item may be deleted from the agenda. Please add your name to items you add.
Who |
What |
[https://launchpad.net/~bapoumba bapoumba] |
aircrack-ng tutorials. Some have been removed (ie moved to jail with the OP's agreement), some are still on boards. Although a legitimate application, it can be misused. Should UF allow wireless crack support? Should a clear policy be written to have all the tutorial handled the same way? |
Previous Meeting Discussions
Sept 10th, 2007:
The Forum Council had a very productive meeting today!
Here is what was covered:
Summary:
1. The Forum Council voted to approve custom user titles at 3500 beans, and no more than 5 infraction points (expired or otherwise) over the user's history. In addition, the current scaling system for user ranks will be adjusted to reflect this decision.
2. The Forum Council voted to reject the CAPTCHA alternatives outlined on the forum thread. The rate limiters and dummy form elements were considered unreliable and ineffective, while the other CAPTCHA alternatives were either too complex/time-consuming to implement or questionably reliable. Forum staff also noted that the need for a CAPTCHA arose out of previous incidents of massive spamming that took a lot of man-hours to clean up.
3. The Forum Council also decided to add a link from the registration page to the Feedback and Help forum, so that users with disabilities hampering them from completing a CAPTCHA can post to this forum as a guest, and then a human (staff member) can assist with the creation of a forum account.
ForumCouncilAgenda (last edited 2017-03-09 14:45:49 by howefield)