||<>|| == Sunday, May 14th, 2017, 7:00pm (1900) PT == === Agenda === 1. Upcoming events 1. Announcements 1. Final discussion of [[NathanHaines/CaliforniaLeadershipDocument|Leadership document]] ([[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NathanHaines/CaliforniaLeadershipDocument?action=diff&rev2=2&rev1=1|diff]]) before beginning a vote. Our meetings are held every other Sunday at 7:00pm (19:00) PT / 03:00 UTC in our IRC channel, [[CaliforniaTeam/ContactUs|#ubuntu-us-ca on freenode]]. All interested people are welcome to join us. For questions or help connecting, check out the InternetRelayChat page or use the Web client linked from the [[CaliforniaTeam/ContactUs|Contact page]]. == Full Log == {{{#!IRC 02:02:02 #startmeeting 02:02:02 Meeting started Mon May 15 02:02:02 2017 UTC. The chair is nhaines. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 02:02:02 02:02:02 Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired 02:02:07 #chair pleia2 lyn||ian 02:02:07 Current chairs: lyn||ian nhaines pleia2 02:02:34 Welcome to the May 14th Ubuntu California LoCo meeting! 02:02:46 Tonight's agenda is available at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CaliforniaTeam/Meetings/17May14 02:02:46 Title: [CaliforniaTeam/Meetings/17May14 - Ubuntu Wiki] 02:03:00 #topic Upcoming events 02:03:18 It's May, Ubuntu 17.04 has been released, and summer's coming up. What's going on? :) 02:03:36 alas, nothing up here so far 02:04:05 Nor down here. 02:04:21 Although the Ubuntu Hours in Pasadena continue happily, as I understand it. 02:04:23 our focus has mostly shifted to LTS for our releases parties 02:04:40 (I'm around but multitasking right now.) 02:04:48 we haven't had an Ubuntu Hour in some time either, but there is someone interested in picking up where I left off 02:05:12 That's good to hear! 02:05:42 Ubuntu Hours are good ways to sort of keep up to date with that's going on in the Ubuntu world. 02:06:01 #topic Announcements 02:06:11 Are there any other announcements this week? 02:06:49 * lyn||ian does not have any 02:07:04 nothing from me either 02:07:27 Okay then, moving on to agenda items. 02:07:48 #topic Final discussion of leadership document amendments before proceeding to a vote 02:08:21 So on February 19th, I proposed an amendment to our leadership document. 02:08:52 There's been no discussion on the mailing list and therefore I assume 100% unanimous assent from the LoCo. :P 02:09:15 nhaines, link now I do not remember any complaints to it 02:09:27 hehe 02:09:42 #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NathanHaines/CaliforniaLeadershipDocument?action=diff&rev2=2&rev1=1 02:09:42 Title: [Diff for "NathanHaines/CaliforniaLeadershipDocument" - Ubuntu Wiki] 02:09:45 the diff of changes 02:09:53 nhaines: care to summarize? 02:10:07 Our current document is here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CaliforniaTeam/Leadership 02:10:07 Title: [CaliforniaTeam/Leadership - Ubuntu Wiki] 02:10:16 And the proposed new document is here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NathanHaines/CaliforniaLeadershipDocument 02:10:16 Title: [NathanHaines/CaliforniaLeadershipDocument - Ubuntu Wiki] 02:10:25 #link https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-us-ca/2017-February/002782.html 02:10:25 Title: [[Ubuntu-US-CA] Proposed amendment to the Ubuntu Californialeadership document.] 02:10:37 ^ Original email about the proposed changes from February 02:11:12 The amendments basically just change references to "leadership council" to "leadership role." 02:11:51 and make that one person instead of a three person council, obviously 02:11:52 The intention is to allow a single elected leader rather than an elected triumvirate, but also to allow a group or two or three leaders in the future if needed. 02:12:03 i read the document back in February, am in favor of it 02:12:21 I like increasing the flexibility here 02:12:40 yes increased flexibility sounds good 02:12:56 I think the trio served its purpose for a time, but we don't want to be locked into something forever if it's not working for us 02:12:57 There's some other silliness in the document, but I haven't changed any of that. :) 02:13:28 If we had more activity I'd want more pondering of it, but until/unless that happens I think one caretaker/leader is fine. 02:13:28 pleia2: yes, and with the lack of leader nominations this last time around, I don't think the group is big enough to support three leaders. 02:13:50 * pleia2 nods 02:14:03 yes nhaines 02:14:11 Which is different from whether or not we *need* three leaders, but I don't think we do, either. :) 02:14:53 In any case, I wanted to give the group a last chance to comment before I called for a vote. 02:15:11 Once the vote on the changes is finished, we can make another call for nominations and do a leadership vote. 02:15:50 thank you for your work on this, sorry it's taken so long to finally talk about it :) 02:15:54 nothing else from me though 02:16:04 It's okay. SCALE and then other things were in the way. :) 02:16:13 Let's vote on whether we should vote. 02:16:19 hehe 02:16:29 #vote Put proposed leadership document amendment to a LoCo-wide vote for ratification. 02:16:29 Please vote on: Put proposed leadership document amendment to a LoCo-wide vote for ratification. 02:16:29 Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (private votes don't work yet, but when they do it will be by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to me) 02:16:32 +1 02:16:32 +1 received from nhaines 02:16:34 +1 02:16:34 +1 received from pleia2 02:16:37 +1 02:16:37 +1 received from dax 02:17:05 +1 02:17:05 +1 received from lyn||ian 02:17:22 #endvote 02:17:22 Voting ended on: Put proposed leadership document amendment to a LoCo-wide vote for ratification. 02:17:22 Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 02:17:22 Motion carried 02:17:47 just going to toss a simple poll up in launchpad/ 02:17:48 ? 02:17:56 That or we can send out a condor-seat ballot to the LoCo. 02:18:34 collecting emails for that is D: 02:18:48 That's okay though, because I'm not the one who has to do it. 02:18:51 and it's just a yes/no anyway, right? 02:18:54 Right. 02:19:03 so condorcet is not so great for it :) 02:19:12 last/only previous amendment was just approved by IRC vote. If you want a non-IRC thing I'd just LP it 02:19:24 well, I can set that up 02:19:31 dax: that's something I should've looked up then. 02:19:43 Do we want to LP it or should we just do an IRC vote next meeting? 02:20:08 pleia2: would LP be easy? 02:20:09 lp is easy and open to more people, irc is hard and I'll be on a train during the next meeting 02:20:15 I vote LP then 02:20:31 Let's vote on how we should vote for the vote. 02:20:38 Nah. I think LP works. 02:20:44 #action pleia2 to set up lp poll for leadership document amendment radification 02:20:44 * darthrobot` pleia2 to set up lp poll for leadership document amendment radification 02:21:09 I find that typo especially pleasing and fitting for a California LoCo vote. :) 02:21:28 pleia2: you'll be a California native yet! 02:21:56 hahahah 02:22:39 raaaad 02:22:39 Okay, I think everything's all set for that, then. 02:22:41 #topic Other business 02:22:51 Any other business this week? 02:22:58 * lyn||ian has none 02:23:18 I don't think so 02:23:45 Okay, I think that's it for this meeting then. 02:23:56 Happy Mother's Day to any mothers and aunts and mentors out there! 02:23:57 thanks for chairing \o/ 02:24:02 Our next meeting will be May 28th. 02:24:25 #endmeeting}}}