Bug importances

Differences between revisions 24 and 25
Revision 24 as of 2010-09-30 08:38:33
Size: 3360
Editor: ABTS-TN-dynamic-023
Comment: try to fix formatting
Revision 25 as of 2010-10-26 17:35:40
Size: 3487
Editor: host194
Comment: change approved at UDS-N : jono, hggdh, charlie-tca
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 23: Line 23:
  * A bug which impacts accessibility of a non-core application.
Line 30: Line 31:
  * A bug which impacts accessibility of a core application

information_little.png This page is part of the Bug Squad’s KnowledgeBase - pages with information about how to triage bugs.

Ubuntu uses the following guidelines for assigning importance. The importance of the bug signifies the priority that it should be given by people fixing bugs.

In order to set the Importance field in Launchpad, you need to be a member of UbuntuBugControl either through direct membership or because of your membership in another team. The importance of the bug should be set as soon as possible.

The importance of a bug report can be modified by clicking on the current Status or Importance, in the yellow line and under the "Affects" column header, which will reveal a sub menu. You can then choose a new importance in the drop down box.

Below is a list of the bug importances and when to use them:

  • Undecided: the default importance for new bugs. It means that there is not sufficient information to determine its importance.

  • Wishlist: a request to add a new feature to one of the programs in Ubuntu.

    • These aren't always bugs, but can be ideas for new features which do not yet exist.
    • These can also be requests to have software packaged for Ubuntu.
    • If it is non-trivial to implement, it should rather be written as a feature specification, see FeatureSpecifications

  • Low: Bugs which affect functionality, but to a lesser extent than most bugs, examples are:

    • Ones that can be easily worked around
    • Ones that affect unusual configurations or uncommon hardware
    • A bug that has a moderate impact on a non-core application
    • A cosmetic/usability issue that does not limit the functionality of an application
  • Medium: most bugs are of medium importance, examples are:

    • A bug that has a moderate impact on a core application.
    • A bug that has a severe impact on a non-core application.
    • A bug which impacts accessibility of a non-core application.
    • A problem with a non-essential hardware component (network card, camera, webcam, music player, sound card, power management feature, printer, etc.)
  • High: A bug which fulfills one of the following criteria:

    • Has a severe impact on a small portion of Ubuntu users (estimated)
    • Makes a default Ubuntu installation generally unusable for some users
      • For example, if the system fails to boot, or X fails to start, on a certain make and model of computer
    • A problem with an essential hardware component (disk controller, laptop built-in wireless, video card, keyboard, mouse)
    • Has a moderate impact on a large portion of Ubuntu users (estimated)
    • A bug which impacts accessibility of a core application
  • Critical: A bug which has a severe impact on a large portion of Ubuntu users

IconHelp2.pngIf you're not yet an Ubuntu Bug Control member, you'll have to ask someone who is to do it for you.Paste the bug number in #ubuntu-bugs channel at FreeNode and say you think the bug should be set to importance 'Wishlist / Low / Medium / High / Critical'. Someone will notice your comment and set it for you, although not necessarily immediately.


CategoryBugSquad

Bugs/Bug importances (last edited 2015-07-25 15:20:42 by es20490446e)