Proposed-Council-Structure

Differences between revisions 17 and 18
Revision 17 as of 2010-03-25 01:44:02
Size: 4237
Editor: CPE-58-174-130-72
Comment:
Revision 18 as of 2010-03-27 05:42:48
Size: 5540
Editor: CPE-58-174-130-72
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
== Current Model: Meritocracy == == 1. Current Model: Meritocracy ==
Line 15: Line 15:
== Normal Model: Democratic == == 2. Normal Model: Democratic ==
Line 38: Line 38:
== State Based Representative Model (Ideally 7 +- 2 people) :Democratic == == 3. State Based Representative Model (Ideally 7 +- 2 people) :Democratic ==
Line 107: Line 107:


== 4. Local City/Region Representative Model ==
 * Each City/Region elects/appoints a representative to the Ubuntu-Au council
 * Its members would represent a city or Region.
    e.g. QLD: Brisbane, Townsville, Cairns, Toowomba, Mt Isa etc.
          NSW: Sydney, Newcastle, Northern Rivers, Dubbo etc.
 * Role: As per description in Model 3.
=== Advantages ===
 * City/Regions have a direct representation on the ubuntu-au council
 * Cuts out a 'State council' layer
 * Each member in the City/Region has a say in appointing/electing representative.
=== Disadvantages ===
 * Election/Appointment Process

== 5. State council Representative Model ==
 * This model would be used in conjunction with model 4. except Regions/Cities would elect/appoint representatives to the 'State council' rather than the Ubuntu-au council
 * A state representative, could then be appointed/elected to represent their respective state in the Ubuntu-au
council.
 * Role: As per Description on Model 3.
== Advantages ==
 * Each state is responsible for appointment/Election of the ubuntu-au council representative for the ubuntu-au council
 * Could be useful if Model 4. is selected and the ubuntu-au council becomes too large.
== Disadvantages ==
 * Another structural layer
 

Proposed Ubuntu-au Council structure

1. Current Model: Meritocracy

  • Loco Contact
  • Web Master

Election Process: Appointed

PRO's

  • Great for starting a LOCO
  • Controls tightly LOCO assets

CON's

  • Process not transparent
  • Breadth of talent is limited
  • Open to accusations of abuse

2. Normal Model: Democratic

  • Chairperson
  • President (Loco contact)
  • Vice-President Treasurer
  • Ordinary Members (4-6)

Election: General (Annual or Bi-annual) Election by all Ubuntu-au Members

ChairPerson

  • Chairs Council meetings (Driving discussion and decisions)
  • Calls Ubuntu-Au elections
  • Ensures that rules and processes put in place are adhered to

President/Vice President

President

  • Serves as the Role of Team Contact for Ubuntu-AU

Vice-President

  • Assists President
  • Maintains records of LoCo membership where necessary

PRO's

  • Creates a process, with public responsibilities

CON's

  • Elections & politicisation

3. State Based Representative Model (Ideally 7 +- 2 people) :Democratic

Chair Person (Loco Contact)

  • Chairs Council meetings (Driving discussion and decisions)
  • Chairs General meetings (Driving discussion and decisions)
  • Calls Ubuntu-Au elections
  • Liaises with Ubuntu-CC
  • Allocates people access to resources (In consultation with Ubuntu-Au council members)
    • eg. Website Admin, List moderators, IRC Ops.
  • Ensures that rules and processes put in place are adhered to

Election: Is reviewed yearly and appointed by Ubuntu-CC (with recommendation from outgoing contact person)

Web Master

  • Responsible for setting up and maintaining the website(s)
  • Website contact
  • Reports to Ubuntu-au council
  • Seeks approval to change website(s) structure (conducts reviews)
  • Seeks approval to grant members restricted access to website(s)

Elections: Elected (Annually) by Council Members, Nominations from Members.

State representatives

  • State contact person
  • Liaises with LUGS & other organisations

  • Drives goals of Ubuntu-au at a local level
  • Provides advice & support, to individuals and regional ubuntu groups.

  • Raises issues (sets agenda items) with the Ubuntu-au Council at Council meetings.
  • Reports back to Ubuntu-au Council on progress of said goals/functions etc.
  • Drives Important events/functions i.e. Release parties
  • Helps with website 'News/Announcement' items
  • Chairs General Ubuntu-au Meetings (when needed)
  • Chairs State Ubuntu-au Meetings (when needed)
  • Helps with Elections
  • Has official status within ubuntu-au and as such represents Ubuntu-au LOCO

Elections: Elected by Ubuntu members in each corresponding state. (Seats are to remain open if no-nominations have been received. Chair person to assume responsibility)

  • ACT
  • QLD
  • VIC
  • NSW
  • WA
  • SA
  • NT

PRO's

  • Gives each state a voice in the direction of the community
  • Deligates responsibility
  • A local contact person
  • Open & Transparent process

CON's

  • Election process & politicisation

  • Rigid structure

Other positions

  • Marketing - Media - Publicity
  • Junior contact (Under the age of 18)
  • Regional Reps e.g. Broom, Albany, Dubbo, Bundaberg, Launceston etc.
  • Membership officers

Meetings

  • Ubuntu-au Council- At least every 3 months, more if urgent issues arise. Quorum: 50% of Council members + 1

  • Ubuntu-au General- Once a Month, if agenda items are posted. Quorum: # of Council members + 1

  • Ubuntu-au State- Once a Month, if agenda items are posted.

Notices are to be posted to email lists, Wiki and ubuntu.com.au and Facebook.

Election Process

Ubuntu-au Council

  • Notice to members, Email Lists, Wiki, ubuntu.org.au, Facebook.
  • Nominations called & displayed on ubuntu.org.au, All positions.

  • Each state conducts an online poll to elect rep (if more than one nomination). Only State members eligible to vote. Each state shall maintain its own 'official' membership list.
  • Web Master appointed by council members.

4. Local City/Region Representative Model

  • Each City/Region elects/appoints a representative to the Ubuntu-Au council
  • Its members would represent a city or Region.
    • e.g. QLD: Brisbane, Townsville, Cairns, Toowomba, Mt Isa etc.
      • NSW: Sydney, Newcastle, Northern Rivers, Dubbo etc.
  • Role: As per description in Model 3.

Advantages

  • City/Regions have a direct representation on the ubuntu-au council
  • Cuts out a 'State council' layer
  • Each member in the City/Region has a say in appointing/electing representative.

Disadvantages

  • Election/Appointment Process

5. State council Representative Model

  • This model would be used in conjunction with model 4. except Regions/Cities would elect/appoint representatives to the 'State council' rather than the Ubuntu-au council
  • A state representative, could then be appointed/elected to represent their respective state in the Ubuntu-au

council.

  • Role: As per Description on Model 3.

Advantages

  • Each state is responsible for appointment/Election of the ubuntu-au council representative for the ubuntu-au council
  • Could be useful if Model 4. is selected and the ubuntu-au council becomes too large.

Disadvantages

  • Another structural layer

AustralianTeam/Proposed-Council-Structure (last edited 2011-02-26 11:34:21 by CPE-58-174-73-150)