Proposed-Council-Structure
|
Size: 4237
Comment:
|
Size: 5540
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| == Current Model: Meritocracy == | == 1. Current Model: Meritocracy == |
| Line 15: | Line 15: |
| == Normal Model: Democratic == | == 2. Normal Model: Democratic == |
| Line 38: | Line 38: |
| == State Based Representative Model (Ideally 7 +- 2 people) :Democratic == | == 3. State Based Representative Model (Ideally 7 +- 2 people) :Democratic == |
| Line 107: | Line 107: |
== 4. Local City/Region Representative Model == * Each City/Region elects/appoints a representative to the Ubuntu-Au council * Its members would represent a city or Region. e.g. QLD: Brisbane, Townsville, Cairns, Toowomba, Mt Isa etc. NSW: Sydney, Newcastle, Northern Rivers, Dubbo etc. * Role: As per description in Model 3. === Advantages === * City/Regions have a direct representation on the ubuntu-au council * Cuts out a 'State council' layer * Each member in the City/Region has a say in appointing/electing representative. === Disadvantages === * Election/Appointment Process == 5. State council Representative Model == * This model would be used in conjunction with model 4. except Regions/Cities would elect/appoint representatives to the 'State council' rather than the Ubuntu-au council * A state representative, could then be appointed/elected to represent their respective state in the Ubuntu-au council. * Role: As per Description on Model 3. == Advantages == * Each state is responsible for appointment/Election of the ubuntu-au council representative for the ubuntu-au council * Could be useful if Model 4. is selected and the ubuntu-au council becomes too large. == Disadvantages == * Another structural layer |
Proposed Ubuntu-au Council structure
1. Current Model: Meritocracy
- Loco Contact
- Web Master
Election Process: Appointed
PRO's
- Great for starting a LOCO
- Controls tightly LOCO assets
CON's
- Process not transparent
- Breadth of talent is limited
- Open to accusations of abuse
2. Normal Model: Democratic
- Chairperson
- President (Loco contact)
- Vice-President Treasurer
- Ordinary Members (4-6)
Election: General (Annual or Bi-annual) Election by all Ubuntu-au Members
ChairPerson
- Chairs Council meetings (Driving discussion and decisions)
- Calls Ubuntu-Au elections
- Ensures that rules and processes put in place are adhered to
President/Vice President
President
- Serves as the Role of Team Contact for Ubuntu-AU
Vice-President
- Assists President
Maintains records of LoCo membership where necessary
PRO's
- Creates a process, with public responsibilities
CON's
Elections & politicisation
3. State Based Representative Model (Ideally 7 +- 2 people) :Democratic
Chair Person (Loco Contact)
- Chairs Council meetings (Driving discussion and decisions)
- Chairs General meetings (Driving discussion and decisions)
- Calls Ubuntu-Au elections
- Liaises with Ubuntu-CC
- Allocates people access to resources (In consultation with Ubuntu-Au council members)
- eg. Website Admin, List moderators, IRC Ops.
- Ensures that rules and processes put in place are adhered to
Election: Is reviewed yearly and appointed by Ubuntu-CC (with recommendation from outgoing contact person)
Web Master
- Responsible for setting up and maintaining the website(s)
- Website contact
- Reports to Ubuntu-au council
- Seeks approval to change website(s) structure (conducts reviews)
- Seeks approval to grant members restricted access to website(s)
Elections: Elected (Annually) by Council Members, Nominations from Members.
State representatives
- State contact person
Liaises with LUGS & other organisations
- Drives goals of Ubuntu-au at a local level
Provides advice & support, to individuals and regional ubuntu groups.
- Raises issues (sets agenda items) with the Ubuntu-au Council at Council meetings.
- Reports back to Ubuntu-au Council on progress of said goals/functions etc.
- Drives Important events/functions i.e. Release parties
- Helps with website 'News/Announcement' items
- Chairs General Ubuntu-au Meetings (when needed)
- Chairs State Ubuntu-au Meetings (when needed)
- Helps with Elections
- Has official status within ubuntu-au and as such represents Ubuntu-au LOCO
Elections: Elected by Ubuntu members in each corresponding state. (Seats are to remain open if no-nominations have been received. Chair person to assume responsibility)
- ACT
- QLD
- VIC
- NSW
- WA
- SA
- NT
PRO's
- Gives each state a voice in the direction of the community
- Deligates responsibility
- A local contact person
Open & Transparent process
CON's
Election process & politicisation
- Rigid structure
Other positions
- Marketing - Media - Publicity
- Junior contact (Under the age of 18)
- Regional Reps e.g. Broom, Albany, Dubbo, Bundaberg, Launceston etc.
- Membership officers
Meetings
Ubuntu-au Council- At least every 3 months, more if urgent issues arise. Quorum: 50% of Council members + 1
Ubuntu-au General- Once a Month, if agenda items are posted. Quorum: # of Council members + 1
Ubuntu-au State- Once a Month, if agenda items are posted.
Notices are to be posted to email lists, Wiki and ubuntu.com.au and Facebook.
Election Process
Ubuntu-au Council
- Notice to members, Email Lists, Wiki, ubuntu.org.au, Facebook.
Nominations called & displayed on ubuntu.org.au, All positions.
- Each state conducts an online poll to elect rep (if more than one nomination). Only State members eligible to vote. Each state shall maintain its own 'official' membership list.
- Web Master appointed by council members.
4. Local City/Region Representative Model
- Each City/Region elects/appoints a representative to the Ubuntu-Au council
- Its members would represent a city or Region.
- e.g. QLD: Brisbane, Townsville, Cairns, Toowomba, Mt Isa etc.
- NSW: Sydney, Newcastle, Northern Rivers, Dubbo etc.
- e.g. QLD: Brisbane, Townsville, Cairns, Toowomba, Mt Isa etc.
- Role: As per description in Model 3.
Advantages
- City/Regions have a direct representation on the ubuntu-au council
- Cuts out a 'State council' layer
- Each member in the City/Region has a say in appointing/electing representative.
Disadvantages
- Election/Appointment Process
5. State council Representative Model
- This model would be used in conjunction with model 4. except Regions/Cities would elect/appoint representatives to the 'State council' rather than the Ubuntu-au council
- A state representative, could then be appointed/elected to represent their respective state in the Ubuntu-au
council.
- Role: As per Description on Model 3.
Advantages
- Each state is responsible for appointment/Election of the ubuntu-au council representative for the ubuntu-au council
- Could be useful if Model 4. is selected and the ubuntu-au council becomes too large.
Disadvantages
- Another structural layer
AustralianTeam/Proposed-Council-Structure (last edited 2011-02-26 11:34:21 by CPE-58-174-73-150)