ArchiveAdministration

-  ⇤ ← Revision 275 as of 2013-02-20 12:52:47 → 
  Size: 43383
  Editor: 82-69-40-219
  Comment: remove my on-duty day; I distribute through the week instead
+   ← Revision 330 as of 2025-07-18 10:56:21 → ⇥
  Size: 6347
  Editor: sally-makin
  Comment: Content has moved to the new Ubuntu Project docs, but split over different pages, hence using deep links rather than redirects.
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 4:
-This page details the processes for the [[https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive|Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators]] team, and hopefully provides a decent guide for new members of the team.
+'''Note that this page's contents have moved to the new [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/|Ubuntu Project documentation]].'''
 Line 6:
-Bugs should be filed against the appropriate packages, and the team '''subscribed''' (''not assigned'') to the bug.

The requests can be found at [[https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+subscribedbugs]].

Team members may assign bugs to themselves and mark them ''In Progress'' if they're working on them, or discussing them; to act as a lock on that request.
-Line 14:
+Line 9:
-We are transitioning towards client-side administration as the necessary facilities become available via the Launchpad API. To get hold of these [[https://code.launchpad.net/+branch/ubuntu-archive-tools|tools]]:
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/maintainers/index-AA/]]
-Line 16:
+Line 11:
- {{{
$ bzr branch lp:ubuntu-archive-tools
}}}

= Logging In =

A few operations still require direct ssh access to `pepo.canonical.com`; accounts are provided to some members of the team.  (We are [[FoundationsTeam/ReplaceArchiveAdminShellAccess|transitioning away from direct shell access]], so new team members will not get accounts here, thereby encouraging us to complete the transition more quickly.)  Changes can only be made as the `lp_archive` user, to which you'll have `sudo` access.

So to begin:
 {{{
$ ssh pepo
$ sudo -u lp_archive -i
}}}

The `-i` is important as `lp_archive`'s `.bashrc` sets the right environment variables and makes sure the directory with all of the tools is placed in the `PATH`.
-Line 34:
+Line 14:
-To work with the upload queue, you may either use the [[https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/quantal/+queue|web interface]] or the `queue` API client in `ubuntu-archive-tools`.  The API client should generally be faster and more flexible; in particular, it is [[Bug:828649|not currently possible to override individual binaries using the web interface]].
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/maintainers/AA/aa-new-review/]]
-Line 36:
+Line 16:
-Both source packages and new binaries which have not yet been approved are not automatically accepted into the archive, but are instead held for checking and manual acceptance.  Once accepted they'll be automatically approved from then on.

The current queue can be obtained with:
 {{{
$ ./queue info
}}}

This is the `NEW` queue for the development series of Ubuntu by default; you can change the queue with `-Q`, the distro with `-D` and the release using `-s`.  To list the `UNAPPROVED` queue for `ubuntu/quantal`, for example:
 {{{
$ ./queue -s quantal -Q unapproved info
}}}

Packages are placed in the `UNAPPROVED` queue if they're uploaded to a closed distribution, and are usually security updates or similar; this should be checked with the uploader.

You can give an string argument after info which is interpreted as a substring match filter.

To obtain a report of the size of all the different queues for a particular release:
 {{{
$ ./queue report
}}}

Back to the `NEW` queue for now, however.  You'll see output that looks somewhat like this:
 {{{
$ ./queue info
 Listing ubuntu/dapper (New) 4
---------|----|----------------------|----------------------|---------------
   25324 | S- | diveintopython-zh    | 5.4-0ubuntu1         | 3 minutes
         | * diveintopython-zh/5.4-0ubuntu1 Component: main Section: doc
   25276 | -B | language-pack-kde-co | 1:6.06+20060427      | 2 hours 20 minutes
         | * language-pack-kde-co-base/1:6.06+20060427/i386 Component: main Section: translations Priority: OPTIONAL
   23635 | -B | upbackup (i386)      | 0.0.1                | 2 days
         | * upbackup/0.0.1/i386 Component: main Section: admin Priority: OPTIONAL
         | * upbackup_0.0.1_i386_translations.tar.gz Format: raw-translations
   23712 | S- | gausssum             | 1.0.3-2ubuntu1       | 45 hours
         | * gausssum/1.0.3-2ubuntu1 Component: main Section: science
---------|----|----------------------|----------------------|---------------
                                                               4
}}}

The number at the start can be used with other commands instead of referring to a package by name.  The next field shows you what is actually in the queue, "`S-`" means it's a new source and "`-B`" means it's a new binary.  You then have the package name, the version and how long it's been in the queue.

New sources need to be checked to make sure they're well packaged, the licence details are correct and permissible for us to redistribute, etc.  See [[PackagingGuide/Basic#NewPackages]], [[PackagingGuide/Basic#Copyright]] and [[http://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html|Debian's Reject FAQ]].  You can fetch a package from the queue for manual checking:
 {{{
$ ./queue fetch 25324
}}}

Or, if you just want to print the URLs so that you can fetch them on a system with a faster network connection:
 {{{
$ ./queue show-urls 25324
}}}

The source is now in the current directory and ready for checking.  Any problems should result in the rejection of the package (also send a mail to the uploader explaining the reason and Cc ubuntu-archive@lists.ubuntu.com):
 {{{
$ ./queue reject 25324
}}}

If the package is fine, you should next check that it's going to end up in the right part of the archive.  On the next line of the `info` output, you have details about the different parts of the package, including which component, section, etc. it is expected to head into.  One of the important jobs is making sure that this information is actually correct through the application of overrides.

To alter the overrides for a package, use:
 {{{
$ ./queue override -c universe ubuntustudio-menu
}}}

Where the override can be `-c <component>`, `-x <section>`, and/or (for binary packages) `-p <priority>`.  If you want to limit the override application to only source or only binary packages, use the `--source` or `--binary` option respectively.

Often a binary will be in the `NEW` queue because it is a shared library that has changed SONAME.  In this case you'll probably want to check the existing overrides to make sure anything new matches.  These can be found in `/ubuntu/indices` on Ubuntu mirrors.

Currently a special case of this are the kernel packages, which change package names with each ABI update and build many distinct binary packages in different sections.  A helper tool has been written to apply overrides to the queue based on the packages that are currently published:
 {{{
$ ./kernel-overrides [-s <sourcepackage>] <newabi>
}}}

Binary packages are not often rejected (they go into a black hole with no automatic notifications), so, check the .deb contains files, run lintian on it and file bugs when things are broken.  The binaries also need to be put into universe etc as appropriate even if the source is already there.

If you're happy with a package, and the overrides are correct, accept it with:
 {{{
$ ./queue accept 23712
}}}

You can also use `./queue accept binary-name` which will accept it for all architectures.
-Line 119:
+Line 19:
-The Canonical partner archive, though not part of Ubuntu proper, is managed using the same tools and queues. As such, use the same procedures when processing partner packages. E.g. (notice 'Component: partner'):
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/partner-archive/]]
-Line 121:
+Line 21:
- {{{
$ ./queue -s hardy info
Listing ubuntu/hardy (New) 2
---------|----|----------------------|----------------------|---------------
 1370980 | S- | arkeia               | 8.0.9-3              | 19 hours
  | * arkeia/8.0.9-3 Component: partner Section: utils
 1370964 | S- | arkeia-amd64         | 8.0.9-3              | 19 hours
  | * arkeia-amd64/8.0.9-3 Component: partner Section: utils
---------|----|----------------------|----------------------|---------------
                                                               2
}}}

Use -j to remove a package:
 {{{
$ ./remove-package -m "request Brian Thomason" -s precise adobe-flashplugin -j
}}}

The rules governing package inclusion in partner are not the same as those for the main Ubuntu archive.  See ExtensionRepositoryPolicy for the Technical Board's requirements regarding the contents of add-on repositories made available through the {{{Software Sources}}} interface.
-Line 142:
+Line 24:
-Sadly packages just don't stay where they're put.  SeedManagement details how packages get chosen for the `main` component, the various meta packages and presence on the CD.  What it doesn't point out is that packages which fall out of the seeding process are destined for the `universe` component.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/maintainers/AA/aa-package-overrides/]]
-Line 144:
+Line 26:
-Every 30 minutes or so, the difference between what the seeds expect to be true and what the archive actually believes is evaluated by the `component-mismatches` tool, and the output placed at:

 http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt

 http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg ([[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.dot|dot source]])

This is split into four sections:

'''Source and binary promotions to main'''
 These are source packages currently in `universe` that appear to need promoting to `main`.  The usual reasons are that they are seeded, or that a package they build has become a dependency or build-dependency of a package in `main`.
 New sources need to be processed through the UbuntuMainInclusionQueue, and have been approved before they should be promoted.  Also ensure that all of their dependencies (which will be in this list) are approved as well.

'''Binary only promotions to main'''
 These are binary packages currently in `universe` that appear to need promoting to `main`, as above; except that their source package is already in `main`.  An inclusion report isn't generally needed, though the package should be sanity checked.
 Especially check that all of the package's dependencies are already in main, or have been approved.

'''Source and binary demotions to universe'''
 Sources and their binaries that are currently in `main` but are no longer seeded or depended on by another package.  These either need to be seeded explicitly, or demoted.

'''Binary only demotions to universe'''
 Binary packages in `main` that are no longer seeded or depended on, but the source is still to remain in `main` -- usually because another binary saves it.  Often these tend to be `-dev` or `-dbg` packages and need to be seeded, rather than demoted; but not always.

Once you've determined what overrides need to be changed, use the `change-override` client-side tool to do it.

To promote a binary package to main:
 {{{
$ ./change-override -c main git-email
}}}

To demote a source package and all of its binaries to universe:
 {{{
$ ./change-override -c universe -S tspc
}}}

Less-used are the options to just move a source, and leave its binaries where it is (usually just to repair a mistaken forgotten `-S`):
 {{{
$ ./change-override -c universe tspc
...oops, forgot the source...
$ ./change-override -c universe -t tspc
}}}

and the option to move a binary and its source, but leave any other binaries where they are:
 {{{
$ ./change-override -c universe -B flite
}}}
-Line 192:
+Line 29:
-== Manual ==
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/maintainers/AA/aa-package-removal/]]
-Line 194:
+Line 31:
-Sometimes packages just need removing entirely, because they are no longer required.  This can be done using the `remove-package` client-side tool:
 {{{
$ ./remove-package -m "reason for removal" konserve
}}}

By default this removes the named source and binaries, to remove just a binary use `-b`:
 {{{
$ ./remove-package -m "NBS" -b konserve
}}}

"NBS" is a common short-hand meaning that the binary is No-longer Built by the Source.

To remove just a source, use `-S`.

The tool tells you what it's going to do, and asks for confirmation before doing it, so it's reasonably safe to get the wrong options and say `N`.

== Blacklisting ==

If you remove source packages which are in Debian, and they are not meant to ever come back, add it to the blacklist in `lp:~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist`, document the reason, and `bzr commit` it with an appropriate changelog. This will avoid getting the package back to source NEW in the next round of autosyncs from Debian.

== Removals in Debian ==

From time to time we should remove packages which were removed in Debian, to avoid accumulating cruft and unmaintained packages. This client-side tool (from `ubuntu-archive-tools`) will interactively go through the removals and ask for confirmation:

 {{{
$ ./process-removals
}}}

Please note that we do need to keep some packages which were removed
in Debian (e. g. "firefox", since we did not do the "firefox" →
"iceweasel" renaming).

== Failed SRUs ==

If a package should be removed from -proposed, use the ```remove-package``` tool (from `ubuntu-archive-tools`). Eg, to remove source and binaries for the ```libreoffice``` package currently in oneiric-proposed:

 {{{
$ ./remove-package -m "SRU abandoned (verification-failed)" -s quantal-proposed libreoffice
}}}
-Line 236:
+Line 34:
-Syncing packages with Debian used to be a reasonably common request.  It is now self-service for developers using `syncpackage`.  If you are asked to process a sync in the old style, you can use the `-s` option to `syncpackage` to do so in the name of the requester.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#syncs]]
-Line 238:
+Line 36:
-Most updates available in Debian are automatically synced before DebianImportFreeze, but packages that were previously in Ubuntu will not be automatically reintroduced.  To process these interactively:
 {{{
$ ./auto-sync --new-only
}}}

To sync from any source which is not automatically imported by Launchpad, use the `syncpackage` tool on a `.dsc` file.  Any uploader can do this; it does not require being an archive administrator.

Likewise, backports are now self-service for members of [[https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-backporters|ubuntu-backporters]] using `backportpackage`.
-Line 249:
+Line 39:
-Sometimes binary packages are not built by any source (NBS) any more. This usually happens with library SONAME changes, package renamings, etc. Those need to be removed from the archive from time to time, and right before a release, to ensure that the entire archive can be rebuilt by current sources.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/maintainers/AA/aa-package-removal/#nbs-related-removals]]
-Line 251:
+Line 41:
-Such packages are detected by `archive-cruft-check`. This tool does not check for reverse dependencies, though, so you should use `checkrdepends -b` for checking if it is safe to actually remove NBS packages from the archive.
-Line 253:
+Line 42:
-Look at the [[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html|half-hourly generated NBS report]] which shows all NBS packages, their reverse dependencies, and a copy-and-paste-able command to clean up the "safe" ones.
+= i386 whitelist updates =
-Line 255:
+Line 44:
-The rest needs to be taken care of by developers, by doing transition uploads for library SONAME changes, updating build dependencies, etc. The remaining files will list all the packages which still need the package in question.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/maintainers/AA/aa-i386/#i386-allowlist-updates]]
-Line 257:
+Line 46:
-Please refrain from removing NBS kernel packages for old ABIs until debian-installer and the seeds have been updated, otherwise daily builds of alternate and server CDs will be made uninstallable.
-Line 261:
+Line 49:
-'''NOTE''': due to [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/562451|bug #562451]], archive administrators cannot currently adjust Launchpad ACLs.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/not-AA/#adjusting-launchpad-acls]]
-Line 263:
+Line 51:
-The new ArchiveReorganisation brings finer grained access controls than what components can provide. Launchpad ACLs allow individuals and teams to have upload or admin rights on certain packages, referred to as sets. In general, an archive administrator can process requests to create and delete package sets, as well as add or remove packages from package sets. Archive administrators should not add individuals or teams to package sets without explicit TechnicalBoard approval.
-Line 266:
+Line 53:
-Packages can be added to or removed from package sets using the ```edit-acl``` tool from `ubuntu-archive-tools`.
-Line 268:
+Line 54:
-To list the packages currently in the package set ```mozilla```:
 {{{
$ ./edit-acl query -P mozilla -S quantal
adblock-plus
all-in-one-sidebar
bindwood
...
}}}
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/not-AA/#package-sets]]
-Line 277:
+Line 56:
-To add a package to the ```mozilla``` package set:
 {{{
$ ./edit-acl -P mozilla -S raring -s foo -s bar -s baz add
}}}

To remove a package from the ```mozilla``` package set:
 {{{
$ ./edit-acl -P mozilla -S raring -s foo delete
}}}

For more information, please see ```edit-acl --help```.
-Line 290:
+Line 58:
-Launchpad supports autosigning of EFI binaries using the Secure Boot signature format.  This is implemented using a "raw uefi" format upload within a binary package build (see the efilinux package in quantal or later for an example).  To provide additional assurance that only trusted EFI bootloaders are signed using this method, packages that include raw UEFI binary uploads land in the unapproved queue and require archive admin approval before they are signed.  Archive admins should review the corresponding source upload for correctness prior to approving these uploads.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/maintainers/AA/aa-signing-bootloaders/#raw-uefi-uploads]]
-Line 294:
+Line 64:
-There are other useful tools in your `PATH` which are invaluable.
-Line 298:
+Line 66:
-`rmadison` (in the `devscripts` package, run on your client system) examines the current state of the archive for a given binary/source package:
 {{{
$ rmadison dpkg
      dpkg | 1.10.22ubuntu2 |         warty | source, amd64, i386, powerpc
      dpkg | 1.10.22ubuntu2.1 | warty-security | source, amd64, i386, powerpc
      dpkg | 1.10.27ubuntu1 |         hoary | source, amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
      dpkg | 1.10.27ubuntu1.1 | hoary-security | source, amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
      dpkg | 1.10.27ubuntu2 | hoary-updates | source, amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
      dpkg | 1.13.10ubuntu4 |        breezy | source, amd64, hppa, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
      dpkg | 1.13.11ubuntu5 |        dapper | source, amd64, hppa, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#archive-state-checks]]
-Line 309:
+Line 68:
-$ rmadison dselect
   dselect | 1.10.22ubuntu2 |         warty | amd64, i386, powerpc
   dselect | 1.10.22ubuntu2.1 | warty-security | amd64, i386, powerpc
   dselect | 1.10.27ubuntu1 |         hoary | amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
   dselect | 1.10.27ubuntu1.1 | hoary-security | amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
   dselect | 1.10.27ubuntu2 | hoary-updates | amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
   dselect | 1.13.10ubuntu4 |        breezy | amd64, hppa, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
   dselect | 1.13.11ubuntu5 |        dapper | amd64, hppa, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
}}}

Or when used with `-S` and a source package, the source and every binary built by it:
 {{{
$ rmadison -S dpkg
      dpkg | 1.10.22ubuntu2 |         warty | source, amd64, i386, powerpc
      dpkg | 1.10.22ubuntu2.1 | warty-security | source, amd64, i386, powerpc
      dpkg | 1.10.27ubuntu1 |         hoary | source, amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
      dpkg | 1.10.27ubuntu1.1 | hoary-security | source, amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
      dpkg | 1.10.27ubuntu2 | hoary-updates | source, amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
      dpkg | 1.13.10ubuntu4 |        breezy | source, amd64, hppa, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
      dpkg | 1.13.11ubuntu5 |        dapper | source, amd64, hppa, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
  dpkg-dev | 1.10.22ubuntu2 |         warty | all
  dpkg-dev | 1.10.22ubuntu2.1 | warty-security | all
  dpkg-dev | 1.10.27ubuntu1 |         hoary | all
  dpkg-dev | 1.10.27ubuntu1.1 | hoary-security | all
  dpkg-dev | 1.10.27ubuntu2 | hoary-updates | all
  dpkg-dev | 1.13.10ubuntu4 |        breezy | all
  dpkg-dev | 1.13.11ubuntu5 |        dapper | all
  dpkg-doc | 1.10.22ubuntu2 |         warty | all
  dpkg-doc | 1.10.22ubuntu2.1 | warty-security | all
  dpkg-doc | 1.10.27ubuntu1 |         hoary | all
  dpkg-doc | 1.10.27ubuntu1.1 | hoary-security | all
  dpkg-doc | 1.10.27ubuntu2 | hoary-updates | all
   dselect | 1.10.22ubuntu2 |         warty | amd64, i386, powerpc
   dselect | 1.10.22ubuntu2.1 | warty-security | amd64, i386, powerpc
   dselect | 1.10.27ubuntu1 |         hoary | amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
   dselect | 1.10.27ubuntu1.1 | hoary-security | amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
   dselect | 1.10.27ubuntu2 | hoary-updates | amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
   dselect | 1.13.10ubuntu4 |        breezy | amd64, hppa, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
   dselect | 1.13.11ubuntu5 |        dapper | amd64, hppa, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
}}}

`checkrdepends` lists the reverse dependencies of a given binary:
 {{{
$ checkrdepends -s raring -b nm-applet
}}}

or source package:
 {{{
$ checkrdepends -s raring network-manager
}}}
-Line 362:
+Line 71:
-A lot of churn in NEW comes from Debian imports. Since they already went through NEW in Debian, we should not waste too much time on it, so there are some tools.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#new-handling]]
-Line 364:
+Line 73:
- * The first thing you need to handle are native syncs. These are syncs performed via URLs like https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/quantal/+localpackagediffs or via the LP API. You can recognize these in the LP queue pages because they have '(sync)' in the name. In `queue info`, they show up as 'X-' (as opposed to 'S-' like normal source uploads). There are no changes files for these, so they cannot currently be fetched via `queue fetch`. To verify a native sync:
  0. Download the source package from Debian (eg, via `dget` or `apt-get source <pkg>=<version>`)
  0. Download the imported dsc file from the Debian project in LP (eg https://launchpad.net/debian/sid/+source/pxe-kexec)
  0. Compare the dsc file from Debian and from LP. Since both should be signed, if they are identical, then you know the package hasn't been tampered with. I can also compare the full source package from Debian and LP if desired.
 Once verified, accept it normally via LP or `./queue accept <srcpkg>`.

 * `./new-binary-debian-universe` accepts all binary NEW packages whose source was imported from Debian and is in universe. With the `--lintian` option, it runs `lintian` over all the imported .debs while it runs, so you can watch the output and note all particularly worrisome issues. When you are happy, say yes at each confirmation prompt.

 * When unpacking a source package for source NEW checks, you should run `suspicious-source`. This is basically a `find -type f` which ignores all files with a known-safe name (such as `*.c`, `configure`, `*.glade`). Every file that it outputs should be checked for being the preferred form of modification, as required by the GPL. This makes it easier to spot PDFs and other binary-only files that are not accompanied by a source.  The `licensecheck` command is also useful for verifying the license status of source packages.
-Line 376:
+Line 76:
-Packages in -proposed can be moved to -updates once they are approved by someone from sru-verification, and have passed the minimum aging period of '''7 days'''. Use the `sru-release` script from `ubuntu-archive-tools` for this:
 {{{
$ ./sru-release quantal kdebase
}}}
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#moving-packages-to-updates]]
-Line 381:
+Line 78:
-Please see `--help`, you can also use this tool to copy packages to `-security` and to the current development release.  N.B. before copying a package to `-security` ping a member of the [[https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+members|ubuntu-security]] team.

 * [[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html|Currently pending SRUs]]
-Line 387:
+Line 81:
-Security uploads in Soyuz are first built, published, and tested in the Security Team's private PPA.  To unembargo them, the security team use a tool that re-publishes them to the primary archive.  This is now [[SecurityTeam/UpdatePublication|self-service]], although you may occasionally be asked to adjust overrides, which can be done in the usual way.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#publishing-security-uploads-from-the-ubuntu-security-private-ppa]]
-Line 391:
+Line 86:
-Mozilla (ie, firefox and thunderbird) uploads in Soyuz are first built, published, and tested in the Mozilla Security Team's public PPA. To publish them into the main archive, use `copy-package` from `ubuntu-archive-tools`. Note that pocket copies to the security pocket should never be done without an explicit request from a member of the Ubuntu Security Team (Mozilla Security Team is not enough), and copies to the proposed pocket should not be done without an explicit request from a member of the SRU Team. Keep in mind that `firefox` 2.0 and later (ie `hardy` and later) will always have a corresponding `xulrunner` package that needs copying.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#publishing-packages-from-the-ubuntu-mozilla-security-public-ppa]]
-Line 393:
+Line 88:
-To publish `firefox-3.0` version `3.0.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1` and `xulrunner-1.9` version `1.9.0.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1` from the `ubuntu-mozilla-security` PPA to the `-security` pocket of `ubuntu`'s `hardy` release, you would do the following:
 {{{
$ ./copy-package -b --ppa=ubuntu-mozilla-security -s hardy --to-primary --to-suite hardy-security -e 3.0.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 firefox-3.0
$ ./copy-package -b --ppa=ubuntu-mozilla-security -s hardy --to-primary --to-suite hardy-security -e 1.9.0.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 xulrunner-1.9
}}}

Alternatively, can use `lp:ubuntu-qa-tools/security-tools/unembargo` like so:
 {{{
$ unembargo --ppa=ubuntu-mozilla-security -r quantal --pocket=proposed chromium-browser
}}}
-Line 405:
+Line 90:
-This works the same as the `ubuntu-mozilla-security` PPA, above. Eg, using `lp:ubuntu-qa-tools/security-tools/unembargo`:
 {{{
$ unembargo --ppa=ubuntu-security-proposed -r quantal --pocket=proposed gnupg
}}}
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#publishing-packages-from-the-ubuntu-security-proposed-public-ppa-to-proposed]]
-Line 411:
+Line 95:
-With the new [[Kernel/StableReleaseCadence|StableReleaseCadence]], kernels are built in the [[https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ppa|kernel team PPA]] and then pocket copied to the proposed pocket in the main archive once they are ACKd.
-Line 413:
+Line 96:
-The two most useful URLs for this process are the [[http://status.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/kernel-bugs/reports/sru-report.html|Kernel SRU Report]], where you will find links to the tracking bugs (the magnifying glasses), as well as the status of each package in each release, and the [[Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow|Kernel SRU workflow]], which outlines in fine detail how each bug task should be handled, what the states mean, etc.  The executive summary of the previous link is "only operate on tasks assigned to your team, and only when they're in the Comfirmed state, and when you do, please reassign to yourself and set the task to Fix Released when you're done".
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#copying-ppa-kernels-to-proposed]]
-Line 415:
+Line 98:
-The [[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html#kernelppa|Pending SRU report]] has a section for the kernel PPA which shows all newer kernels in the PPA, provides clickable links to open all bugs (with separate CVE bugs), and copy&pasteable `copy-proposed-kernel` and `sru-accept` commands (both in `ubuntu-archive-tools`).
To publish `linux` version `2.6.32-27.49` from the `canonical-kernel-team` PPA to the `-proposed` pocket of `ubuntu`'s `lucid` release, you would do the following:

 * Click on the "open bugs" button and check that the bugs are in a reasonable state, i. e. they target the right source package (`linux` vs. `linux-ec2` etc.), are fixed in the development release (or at least upstream),   and that the changes are limited to bug fixes, and are in general within the boundaries of the StableReleaseUpdates policy. They should ideally have a task for the stable release the SRU targets. Note that this button does not open CVE bugs, as they don't get verification or other tracking (there is a separate button for opening them, if desired).

 * Find the tracking bug by either traversing through the list of bugs, or opening the .changes file and looking at the top (the release bug is pointed out there). Ensure that there is a proper stable task, and that the main (development release) task is invalid.

 * Run the `copy-proposed-kernel` command to copy it to -proposed.  Once the kernels are copied to proposed and accepted, update the bug to close the Promote-to-proposed task and assign it to yourself.

 However, with some flavours like -ec2 or armel kernels, which are mostly just a merge with the main `linux` kernel, it is too much overhead to add -ec2 tasks to all the bugs.

 * Due to current limitations of Launchpad, new packages copied from a PPA into the archive sometimes go to 'universe'. As a result, please '''verify the overrides for all packages''' copied to -proposed, otherwise these packages might become uninstallable when they are ultimately copied to -updates/-security. ```find-bin-overrides``` from lp:ubuntu-qa-tools can help with this. You use it like so: `find-bin-overrides <pocket to compare to> <target pocket> <ubuntu release> <source package>=<version in pocket to compare to>,<old abi>,<new abi>`. Eg, suppose there is a new kernel in hardy-proposed with a new ABI of 2.6.24-30 and you want to get a list of overrides for the new kernel based on the old ABI of 2.6.24-16 in the 2.6.24.12-16.34 version from the release pocket of hardy. For the `linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 source package`, you might use:
 {{{
$ find-bin-overrides release proposed hardy \
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24=2.6.24.12-16.34,2.6.24-16,2.6.24-30
# hardy/linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24
./change-override -c multiverse -s hardy-proposed fglrx-kernel-source ...
./change-override -c restricted -s hardy-proposed avm-fritz-firmware-2.6.24-30 ...
}}}
 For the `linux` source package, you might use:
 {{{
$ find-bin-overrides release proposed hardy linux=2.6.24-16.30,2.6.24-16,2.6.24-30
# hardy/linux
...
}}}
 You may also specify `--show-main` to also show the the change-override command to move things to main. This can be useful if you know the overrides are very wrong. See `find-bin-overrides -h` for details.

'''TODO:''' A process/script similar to `kernel-overrides` should be developed to make sure overrides are properly handled for binaries not in main. Is ```find-bin-overrides``` from lp:ubuntu-qa-tools good enough?
-Line 446:
+Line 101:
-Security uploads are distributed from a single system, `security.ubuntu.com` (consisting of one or a small number of machines in the Canonical datacentre). While this ensures much quicker distribution of security updates than is possible from a mirror network, it places a very high load on the machines serving `security.ubuntu.com`, as well as inflating Canonical's bandwidth expenses very substantially. Every new installation of a stable release of Ubuntu is likely to be shortly followed by downloading all security updates to date, which is a significant ongoing cost.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#copying-security-uploads-to-updates]]
-Line 448:
+Line 103:
-To mitigate this, we periodically copy security uploads to the -updates pocket, which is distributed via the regular mirror network. (In fact, the pooled packages associated with -security are mirrored too, but mirrored -security entries are not in the default `/etc/apt/sources.list` to avoid causing even more HTTP requests on every `apt-get update`.) This is a cheap operation, and has no effect on the timely distribution of security updates, other than to reduce the load on central systems.

The `copy-report` tool lists all security uploads that need to be copied to -updates. If the package in question is not already in -updates, it can be copied without further checks. Otherwise, `copy-report` will extract the changelogs (which may take a little while) and confirm that the package in -security is a descendant of the package in -updates. If that is not the case, it will report that the package needs to be merged by hand.

The output of the tool looks like this:

 {{{
$ ./copy-report
The following packages can be copied safely:
--------------------------------------------

copy-package -y -b -s feisty-security --to-suite feisty-updates -e 8.3.5-6ubuntu2.1 tk8.3
copy-package -y -b -s feisty-security --to-suite feisty-updates -e 8.4.14-0ubuntu2.1 tk8.4
}}}

The block of output under "The following packages can be copied safely:" may be copied and pasted in its entirety (or run `copy-report --safe`). If there is a block headed "The following packages need to be merged by hand:", then make sure that the security team is aware of those cases.

Note that `copy-report --safe` is run from a cron job as the `ubuntu-archive` user on `people.canonical.com`, and so does not typically need to be run by hand.
-Line 469:
+Line 106:
-`copy-package` is a versatile tool and can be used for a number of other purposes.  If you are doing something not documented here, please ask on `#ubuntu-release` first.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#other-copies]]
-Line 471:
+Line 108:
-Archive administrators technically (as in, per the ACLs) have the ability to copy into the `RELEASE` pocket of the current development series.  Please do not do this; that pocket is owned by the [[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/|proposed-migration]] tools, and those tools have built-in override facilities for the cases where they are wrong.  The release team has [[https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu|access]] to apply such overrides when needed.
-Line 474:
+Line 110:
-Updates to the partner archive follow a similar process as packages in the Ubuntu archive. Specifically, packages are first built in the proposed pocket, then they need to be copied to the release pocket after they are built and then cleaned up from the proposed pocket. The process is (examples show adobe-flashplugin being updated for quantal):
 0. Review the package in the "unapproved" queue, and if appropriate, accept the package into partner for the proposed pocket (in this example, proposed for quantal)
 0. When the package builds on all architectures, copy it to the partner release pocket (this makes it available to users). Eg:
 {{{
$ ./copy-package -b --auto-approve --partner -s quantal-proposed --to-suite quantal adobe-flashplugin
}}}
 0. Remove the package from proposed in the partner archive. Eg:
 {{{
$ ./remove-package --partner -m "copied to release" -s quantal-proposed adobe-flashplugin
}}}
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#handling-updates-to-partner]]
-Line 487:
+Line 116:
-The "unapproved" queue holds packages while a release is frozen, i. e. while a
milestone or final freeze is in progress, or for post-release updates (like
hardy-proposed). Packages in these queues need to be scrutinized before they
get accepted.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/not-AA/#diffs-for-unapproved-uploads]]
-Line 492:
+Line 118:
-This can be done with the `queuediff` tool in `ubuntu-archive-tools`, which
generates a debdiff between the current version in the archive, and the
package sitting in the unapproved queue:

 {{{
$ ./queuediff -s hardy-updates hal
$ ./queuediff -b human-icon-theme | view -
}}}

`-s` specifies the release pocket to compare against and defaults to the
current development release. Please note that the pocket of the unapproved
queue is not checked or regarded; i. e. if there is a `hal` package waiting in
hardy-proposed/unapproved, but the previous version already migrated to
`hardy-updates`, then you need to compare against hardy-updates, not -proposed.

Check `--help`, the tool has more options, such as specifying a different
mirror, or `-b` to open the referred Launchpad bugs in the webbrowser.

This tool works very fast if the new package does not change the orig.tar.gz,
then it only downloads the diff.gz. For native packages or new upstream
versions it needs to download both tarballs and run debdiff on them. Thus for
large packages you might want to do this manually in the data center.
-Line 517:
+Line 121:
-This section contains some copy&paste shell bits which ease recurring jobs.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#useful-runes]]
-Line 521:
+Line 126:
-In some cases, binary packages fail to move from the incoming queue to the accepted queue.  To fix this, run {{{~lp_buildd/reprocess-failed-to-move}}} as lp_buildd
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#reprocess-failed-to-move]]
-Line 525:
+Line 131:
-If a source upload fails for spurious/transient reasons (you can check in `pepo:/srv/launchpad.net/production-logs/lp_queue/process-upload.log`), ask webops to locate the appropriate `upload-*` directory and corresponding `.distro` file in `/srv/launchpad.net/ubuntu-queue/` (they will probably be in either `failed` or `rejected`) and move them both back to `/srv/launchpad.net/ubuntu-queue/incoming/`.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#reprocessing-failed-source-uploads]]
-Line 530:
+Line 137:
-SRU packages in -proposed must be approved by ~ubuntu-sru before accepting.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/not-AA/#stable-release-updates]]
-Line 532:
+Line 139:
-Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Reviewing_procedure_and_tools
-Line 535:
+Line 141:
- * Language packs are a special case; these packages are normally uploaded as a batch and will not normally reference specific bugs.  The [[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html|status page]] will only show {{{language-pack-en}}}.  Please see [[http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/langpack-o-matic/main/view/head:/doc/operator-guide.txt|the documentation]] how to copy packages between PPA, -proposed, and -updates.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/not-AA/#langpack-srus]]
-Line 539:
+Line 147:
-[[http://extras.ubuntu.com/|extras.ubuntu.com]] is not managed by the Ubuntu archive administration team, but is a PPA owned by the [[https://launchpad.net/~app-review-board|Application Review Board]].
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#other-archives]]
-Line 543:
+Line 152:
-Equally useful to the tools are the various auto-generated web pages in ubuntu-archive's `public_html` that can give you a feel for the state of the archive.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#useful-web-pages]]
-Line 545:
+Line 154:
-[[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt]]

  As described above, this lists the differences between the archive and the output of the germinate script.  Shows up packages that are in the wrong place, or need seeding.

[[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/]]

  This is the output of the germinate script, split up into each release of each flavour of ubuntu.  

[[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/priority-mismatches.txt]]

  Shows discrepancies between priorities of packages and where they probably should go according to the seeds.

[[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/architecture-mismatches.txt]]

  Shows override discrepancies between architectures, which are generally bugs.

[[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing/quantal_probs.html]]

  Generated by the half-hourly run of `britney` and indicates packages that are uninstallable on quantal, usually due to missing dependencies or problematic conflicts.

[[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing/quantal_outdate.html]]

  Lists differences between binary and source versions in the archive.  This often shows up both build failures (where binaries are out of date for particular architectures) but also where a binary is no longer built from the source.

[[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS/]]
[[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html]]

  This contains a list of binary packages which are not built from source (NBS) any more. The files contain the list of reverse dependencies of those packages (output of `checkrdepends -b`). These packages need to be removed eventually, thus all reverse dependencies need to be fixed. This is updated half-hourly.
-Line 577:
+Line 158:
-/!\ Please note that chroot management is something generally handled by Canonical IS (and specifically by Adam Conrad).  The following section documents the procedures required should one have to, for instance, remove all the chroots for a certain suite to stop the build queue in its tracks while a breakage is hunted down and fixed, but please don't take this as an open invitation to mess with the buildd chroots willy-nilly.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#chroot-management]]
-Line 579:
+Line 160:
-Soyuz stores one chroot per (suite, architecture).
-Line 581:
+Line 161:
-`manage-chroot.py`, which runs only as 'lp_buildd' in pepo or cesium, allows the following actions upon a specified chroot:
+= Archive administration shifts =
-Line 583:
+Line 163:
- {{{
$ sudo -u lp_buildd -i
lp_buildd@pepo:~$ LPCONFIG=ftpmaster /srv/launchpad.net/production/launchpad/scripts/ftpmaster-tools/manage-chroot.py
ERROR   manage-chroot.py <add|update|remove|get>
}}}
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#archive-administration-shifts]]
-Line 589:
+Line 165:
-Downloading (get) an existing chroot:
-Line 591:
+Line 166:
- {{{
$ manage-chroot.py [-s SUITE] <-a ARCH> get
}}}
+= Archive Administration and Freezes =
-Line 595:
+Line 168:
-The chroot will be downloaded and stored in the local disk name as 'chroot-<DISTRIBUTION>-<SERIES>-<ARCHTAG>.tar.bz2'
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/not-AA/#archive-administration-and-freezes]]
-Line 597:
+Line 170:
-Uploading (add/update) a new chroot:
-Line 599:
+Line 171:
- {{{
$ manage-chroot.py [-s SUITE] <-a ARCH> add -f <CHROOT_FILE>
}}}
+= OEM metapackages =
-Line 603:
+Line 173:
-'add' and 'update' action are equivalents. The new chroot will be immediatelly used for the next build job in the corresponding architecture.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/not-AA/#oem-metapackages]]
-Line 605:
+Line 175:
-Disabling (remove) an existing chroot:
-Line 607:
+Line 176:
-/!\ Unless you have plans for creating a new chroots from scratch, it's better to download them to disk before the removal (recover is possible, but involves direct DB access)
+= Outdated =
-Line 609:
+Line 178:
- {{{
$ manage-chroot.py [-s SUITE] <-a ARCH> remove
}}}
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#outdated]]
-Line 613:
+Line 180:
-No builds will be dispatched for architectures with no chroot, the build-farm will continue functional for the rest of the system.
-Line 615:
+Line 181:
-= Archive days =
+== Logging In ==
-Line 617:
+Line 183:
-This is currently being re-assessed to a more task oriented approach, rather than regular admin days.

Current members with regular admin days are:
 * Monday: SteveLangasek (?)
 * Tuesday:
 * Wednesday:
 * Thursday, SteveKowalik (?)
 * Friday: JamieStrandboge

Available for adhoc requests:
 * DustinKirkland (syncs, bug processing)
 *  JonathanRiddell

On an archive day, the following things should be done:
 * Process all [[https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+subscribedbugs|pending archive bugs]]. Most of those are syncs, removals, component fixes, but there might be other, less common, requests.
 * Process the NEW queues of the current development release and `*-backports` of all supported stable releases.
 * If we are not yet in the DebianImportFreeze, run `process-removals` to review/remove packages which were removed in Debian.
 * Clean up component-mismatches, and poke people to fix dependencies/write MIRs.
 * Look at [[http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing/raring_probs.html]], fix archive-admin related issues (component mismatches, etc.), and prod maintainers to fix package related problems.
 * Remove NBS packages without reverse dependencies, and prod maintainers to rebuild/fix packages to eliminate reverse dependencies to NBS packages.

== Archive Administration and Freezes ==

Archive admins should be familiar with the FreezeExceptionProcess, however it is the bug submitter's and sponsor's responsibility to make sure that the process is being followed. Some things to keep in mind for common tasks:
 * When the archive is frozen (ie the week before a Milestone, or from one week before RC until the final release), you need an ACK from ubuntu-release for all main/restricted uploads
 * During the week before final release, you need an ACK from `ubuntu-release` for any uploads to universe/multiverse
 * When the archive is not frozen, bugfix-only sync requests can be processed if filed by a `core-dev`, `ubuntu-dev` or `motu` (universe/multiverse only) or have an ACK by a sponsor or someone from ubuntu-sponsors.
 * After FeatureFreeze, all (new or otherwise) packages in the archive (ie main, restricted, universe and multiverse) require an ACK from ubuntu-release for any !FreezeException (eg FeatureFreeze, UserInterfaceFreeze, and [[MilestoneProcess|Milestone]]). Packages that do not require a !FreezeException can be processed normally.

See FreezeExceptionProcess for complete details.
+This section can now be found at [[https://canonical-ubuntu-project.readthedocs-hosted.com/staging/aa-museum/#logging-in]]

Ubuntu Wiki

ArchiveAdministration

1. Client-side tools

2. NEW Processing

2.1. partner archive

3. Component Mismatches and Changing Overrides

4. Removals

5. Syncs

6. NBS

7. i386 whitelist updates

8. Adjusting Launchpad ACLs

8.1. Package sets

9. Raw UEFI uploads

10. Useful tools

10.1. Archive state checks

10.2. NEW handling

10.3. Moving Packages to Updates

10.4. Publishing security uploads from the ubuntu-security private PPA

10.5. Publishing packages from the ubuntu-mozilla-security public PPA

10.6. Publishing packages from the ubuntu-security-proposed public PPA to proposed

10.7. Copying PPA kernels to proposed

10.8. Copying security uploads to updates

10.9. Other copies

10.10. Handling updates to partner

10.11. Diffs for unapproved uploads

11. Useful runes

11.1. reprocess-failed-to-move

11.2. Reprocessing failed source uploads

12. Stable release updates

12.1. langpack SRUs

13. Other archives

14. Useful web pages

15. Chroot management

16. Archive administration shifts

17. Archive Administration and Freezes

18. OEM metapackages

19. Outdated

19.1. Logging In